Assessing and mitigating environmental impacts of construction materials: Insights from environmental product declarations

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Zhonghan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nurdiawati, Anissa [1 ,2 ]
Kanwal, Qudsia [1 ,2 ]
Al-Humaiqani, Mohammed M. [1 ,2 ]
Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol KAUST, Environm Sci & Engn Program, Biol & Environm Sci & Engn Div, Thuwal 239556900, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol KAUST, KAUST Climate & Livabil Initiat, Thuwal 239556900, Saudi Arabia
[3] Renmin Univ China, Sch Ecol & Environm, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Environmental product declarations (EPDs); Construction material; Environmental impacts; Environmental footprint; Mitigation strategies; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; BLAST-FURNACE SLAG; END-OF-LIFE; ALUMINUM PRODUCTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; BUILDING-MATERIALS; CARBON EMISSIONS; EMBODIED CARBON; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110929
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Construction activities significantly impact natural resources and the environment, accounting for 40 % of global energy consumption and 36 % of carbon emissions. This study evaluates the environmental impacts of various primary construction materials by leveraging more original and comprehensive Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and incorporates insights from prevvious research to summarize effective mitigation strategies. Analyzing the environmental impact per unit mass is a critical step toward building-level assessments, enabling the strategic replacement of high-pollution materials with lower-impact alternatives to optimize environmental outcomes. The quantitative analysis of data from 180 EPDs indicates that aluminum and steel have the highest median total environmental impacts per unit mass, followed by plastics, while wood, cement, and concrete have relatively lower impacts. Overall, Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) and Global Warming Potential (GWP) are identified as the primary environmental impacts of construction materials. At the building level, the environmental footprint varies based on the quantity of each material used, leading to substantial overall impacts. Furthermore, this study explores the relationships between different environmental impacts, finding positive correlations between GWP and Primary Energy Non-Renewable Energy (PENRE), Acidification Potential (AP), and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP). A comprehensive literature review identifies the key environmental hotspots and mitigation strategies for high-impact materials such as aluminum, steel, cement, and concrete. Common strategies include innovative production methods, waste recycling, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and the development of low-carbon materials. By integrating quantitative EPDs analysis with a qualitative literature review, this research provides a holistic understanding of the environmental burdens of construction materials, offering a valuable framework for developing sustainable policies and practices within the construction industry.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards comparable environmental product declarations of construction materials: Insights from a probabilistic comparative LCA approach
    AzariJafari, Hessam
    Guest, Geoffrey
    Kirchain, Randolph
    Gregory, Jeremy
    Amor, Ben
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 190 (190)
  • [2] Assessing the completeness and comparability of environmental product declarations
    More, Flavia Bittencourt
    Galindro, Bruno Menezes
    Soares, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 375
  • [3] Environmental product declarations
    Nelson, Kessel
    Standardization News, 2012, 40 (06) : 26 - 27
  • [4] Assessing the environmental impacts of construction in Antarctica
    Guedes Montarroyos, Dielly Christine
    de Alvarez, Cristina Engel
    Braganca, Luis
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2019, 79
  • [5] The Role of Environmental Product Declarations in the Decarbonization of Building Materials and Components
    Asdrubali, Francesco
    Grazieschi, Gianluca
    Gandola, Dante Maria
    ENERGIES, 2025, 18 (05)
  • [6] Environmental product declarations for telecommunication products
    Legarth, JB
    Hirsbak, S
    Gregersen, J
    Erichsen, H
    Borch, E
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2000, : 248 - 253
  • [7] Environmental Product Declarations of Structural Wood: A Review of Impacts and Potential Pitfalls for Practice
    Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard
    Andersen, Camilla Ernst
    Wittchen, Alexandra
    Hansen, Rasmus Noddegaard
    Birgisdottir, Harpa
    BUILDINGS, 2021, 11 (08)
  • [8] Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context
    Vitor E. M. Cardoso
    Luís Sanhudo
    José Dinis Silvestre
    Manuela Almeida
    António Aguiar Costa
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 759 - 788
  • [9] Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context
    Cardoso, Vitor E. M.
    Sanhudo, Luis
    Silvestre, Jose Dinis
    Almeida, Manuela
    Costa, Antonio Aguiar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (05): : 759 - 788
  • [10] Recommended to Include Relevant Material Performance in the Construction Material Environmental Product Declarations
    Butt, Ali Azhar
    Wu, Rongzong
    Harvey, John
    PAVEMENT, ROADWAY, AND BRIDGE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT 2024, ISPRB LCA 2024, 2024, 51 : 43 - 49