Spatial-temporal Evolution and Driving Factors Analysis of Ecological Environment Quality in Daihai Basin based on AWRSEI

被引:3
|
作者
Zhao J.-L. [1 ]
Li X. [1 ,2 ]
Sun B. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot
[2] Inner Mongolia Water Saving Agricultural Engineering Research Center, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot
[3] Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Environmental Monitoring Station Hohhot Branch, Hohhot
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2024年 / 45卷 / 03期
关键词
Daihai Basin; ecological environment quality; geographic detector; remote sensing ecological index(RSEI); spatial autocorrelation;
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.202305059
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Watersheds are an important ecological security barrier and social and economic development area. In order to evaluate the ecological environment quality of arid and semiarid watersheds more objectively and accurately,based on the remote sensing ecological index(RSEI),the salinity index was introduced to construct a remote sensing ecological index(AWRSEI)suitable for arid and semi-arid watersheds,and the Daihai watershed was taken as an example to analyze its applicability. Based on the AWRSEI model,four phases of Landsat TM/OLI composite images were used to quantitatively evaluate the ecological and environmental quality of the Daihai Basin from 2001 to 2020. The spatio-temporal evolution of the ecological and environmental quality of the Daihai Basin was analyzed using the coefficient of variation and spatial autocorrelation,and the cause analysis and driving factor explanation power analysis were carried out using geographic detectors. The results showed that:① the average correlation coefficient between AWRSEI and various ecological factors was 0. 860,which was more representative than that of a single index component. The load positive and negative values and ranking of the first principal component were consistent with those of RSEI,the contribution rate of eigenvalues was 3. 69% higher than those of RSEI,and the evaluation results were closer to the real surface conditions,which is suitable for the ecological environment quality assessment of arid watersheds. ② The annual average of the AWRSEI index in the Daihai Basin from 2001 to 2020 was 0. 427,which indicated a poor ecological environment quality basis. During the study period,the average of AWRSEI showed a fluctuating trend and reached the highest value of 0. 502 in 2020. The overall ecological environment quality improved significantly,the deterioration area decreased by 20. 51%,and the improvement area increased by 12. 71%. In terms of spatial distribution,the ecological environment quality of forest land in the southern and northwestern high-altitude areas of the Daihai Basin was good,whereas that in the northern and southern mid-altitude areas was poor,and that in the northern area was better than that in the southern area. ③ The average variation coefficient of AWRSEI in the Daihai Basin was 0. 280,the ecological environment quality was stable,and the overall change fluctuation was small;the high fluctuation was mainly concentrated in the southern part of the lake and the residential area. There was a significant spatial autocorrelation in the ecological environment quality of the Daihai Basin,and the high-high agglomeration area was mainly distributed in the forest area at high altitude and the cultivated land area at low altitude. Low-low concentration areas were scattered in the middle altitude area. ④ The improvement of the ecological environment in Daihai Basin from 2001 to 2020 was mainly due to the increase in NDVI and the decrease in NDBSI and NDSI. NDVI and NDBSI were the combination with the strongest interaction and the strongest interpretation of the ecological environment. Land use was the dominant factor of AWRSEI and had the strongest explanatory power. The combination of land use and meteorological factors was the strongest interaction,and the relationship between each driving factor was enhanced. © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1598 / 1614
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Chen J., Reality·Theory·Practice: Deeply grasp the three dimensions of Xi Jinping thought on ecological civilization:based on the study and research of the spirit of the 20th CPC national congress, Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), (2022)
  • [2] 2, pp. 78-80, (2019)
  • [3] Wang W Y, Liu L, Li M J, Et al., Scenario-based simulation and analysis of future terrestrial ecosystem changes in Inner Mongolia under different ecological-economic development pathways[J], Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 14, pp. 5888-5898, (2021)
  • [4] Liu J., Study on spatial and temporal variation of the boundary and area of the semi-arid region in Northern China over the past 60 years, (2019)
  • [5] Xu H Q., A remote sensing urban ecological index and its application[J], Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 24, pp. 7853-7862, (2013)
  • [6] Xu H Q, Li C Q, Lin M J., Should RSEI use PCA or kPCA?, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 48, 4, pp. 506-513, (2023)
  • [7] Xu H Q, Duan W F, Deng W H, Et al., RSEI or MRSEI? Comment on Jiaet al. evaluation of eco-environmental quality in Qaidam basin based on the ecological index(MRSEI)and GEE. Remote Sens. 2021,13,4543[J], Remote Sensing
  • [8] Hua Y C, Sun X T, Bai A, Et al., Monitoring and evaluation of ten kongdui eco-environmental quality changes in Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River Basin based on remote sensing[J], Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 29, 5, pp. 199-205, (2022)
  • [9] Zhao G Y, Peng P H., RSEI - based evaluation on ecological environment changes in typical dry hot valley — Panzhihua city, Sichuan,China[J], Mountain Research, 39, 6, pp. 842-854, (2021)
  • [10] Wen X L, Chen X, Xu H Q., Ecological evaluation of cities in southern Beijing suburbs based on remote sensing ecological Index: taking Zhuozhou City and Gu'an County as examples, Journal of Fuzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 50, 2, pp. 286-292, (2022)