Stroke Dataset Modeling: Comparative Study of Machine Learning Classification Methods

Stroke prediction is a vital research area due to its significant implications for public health. This comparative study offers a detailed evaluation of algorithmic methodologies and outcomes from three recent prominent studies on stroke prediction. Ivanov et al. tackled issues of imbalanced datasets and algorithmic bias using deep learning techniques, achieving notable results with a 98% accuracy and a 97% recall rate. They utilized resampling methods to balance the classes and advanced imputation techniques to handle missing data, underscoring the critical role of data preprocessing in enhancing the performance of Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Hassan et al. addressed missing data and class imbalance using multiple imputations and the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). They developed a Dense Stacking Ensemble (DSE) model with over 96% accuracy. Their results underscore the efficiency of ensemble learning techniques and imputation for handling imbalanced datasets in stroke prediction. Bathla et al. employed various classifiers and feature selection techniques, including SMOTE, for class balancing. Their Random Forest (RF) classifier, combined with Feature Importance (FI) selection, achieved an accuracy of 97.17%, illustrating the positive impact of RF and relevant feature selection on model performance. A comparative analysis indicated that Ivanov et al.'s method achieved the highest accuracy rate. However, the studies collectively highlight that the choice of models and techniques for stroke prediction should be tailored to the specific characteristics of the dataset used. This study emphasizes the importance of effective data management and model selection in enhancing predictive performance.