Influence of dynamic behavior of supercooled large droplets on airfoil icing

被引:0
|
作者
Liu F. [1 ]
Deng T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sino-European Institute of Aviation Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin
[2] Key Laboratory of Icing and Anti/De-Icing, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
aerodynamic characteristics; airfoil icing; dynamic behavior; geometric characteristics of ice shape; supercooled large droplets;
D O I
10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0213
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Supercooled large droplets (SLD) represent one of the most hazardous flight conditions. The unique dynamic behavior of large droplets, including deformation, fragmentation, splash, and rebound, poses challenges for accurately assessing SLD icing using traditional icing calculation methods. In this study, the Navier-Stokes method was employed to solve the flow field, the Euler method was used to calculate droplet impact, and the Shallow Water model was utilized to simulate ice accretion. The credibility of the proposed methodology was verified by comparing the results with NASA experimental data. The findings demonstrate that the dynamic behavior of SLD significantly influences icing and ice formation. Specifically, deformation and fragmentation alter the trajectory and impact range of droplets, reducing the droplet impact limit, resulting in a 2.83% and 2.13% decrease in upper and lower icing limits, respectively. Splashing reduces the collection efficiency of droplets near the stagnation point, resulting in an 8.09% reduction in leading-edge ice accretion. Rebound considerably lowers the droplet impact limit, leading to a 30.69% and 20.01% decrease in upper and lower icing limits, respectively. Moreover, the re-entry of secondary droplets into the flow field following rebound increases the upper and lower icing limits by 6.14% and 3.71%, respectively. Furthermore, the aerodynamic performance of the ice-contaminated airfoil significantly deteriorates compared to a clean airfoil. At the same angle of attack, the lift decreases, the drag increases, and the aerodynamic efficiency decreases. © 2024 Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (BUAA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 186
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Airplane and engine certification requirements in supercooled large drop, mixed phase, and ice crystal icing conditions: RIN 2120–AJ34, (2010)
  • [2] VILLEDIEU P, TRONTIN P, GUFFOND D, Et al., SLD Lagrangian modeling and capability assessment in the frame of ONERA 3D icing suite, 4th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, (2012)
  • [3] HONSEK R, HABASHI W G, AUBE M S., Eulerian modeling of in-flight icing due to supercooled large droplets, Journal of Aircraft, 45, 4, pp. 1290-1296, (2008)
  • [4] BOURGAULT Y, HABASHI W G, DOMPIERRE J, Et al., A finite element method study of Eulerian droplets impingement models, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 29, 4, pp. 429-449, (2015)
  • [5] IULIANO E, MINGIONE G, PETROSINO F, Et al., Eulerian modeling of SLD physics towards more realistic aircraft icing simulation, AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, (2010)
  • [6] LEAL L G., Bubbles, drops and particles, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 5, 3, pp. 229-230, (1979)
  • [7] PILCH M, ERDMAN C A., Use of breakup time data and velocity history data to predict the maximum size of stable fragments for acceleration-induced breakup of a liquid drop, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 13, 6, pp. 741-757, (1987)
  • [8] HSIANG L P, FAETH G M., Near-limit drop deformation and secondary breakup, Int Multiphase Flow, 18, 5, pp. 635-652, (1992)
  • [9] O'ROURKE P J, AMSDEN A A., The TAB method for numerical calculation of spray droplet breakup: No. 872089, pp. 148-161, (1987)
  • [10] CLARK M M., Drop breakup in a turbulent flow-I. Conceptual and modeling considerations, Chemical Engineering Science, 43, 3, pp. 671-679, (1988)