Prioritizing sustainability indicators for Uganda's built environment: Expert perspectives using the Delphi technique

被引:0
|
作者
Kajjoba, Derrick [1 ]
Wesonga, Racheal [2 ]
Olupot, Peter W. [1 ]
Kirabira, John B. [1 ]
Lwanyaga, Joseph D. [1 ,3 ]
Kasedde, Hillary [1 ]
机构
[1] Makerere Univ, Coll Engn Design Art & Technol, Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, POB 7062, Kampala, Uganda
[2] Makerere Univ, Coll Engn Design Art & Technol, Sch Built Environm, Dept Construct Econ & Management, POB 7062, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Busitema Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Water Resources Engn, POB 236, Tororo, Uganda
关键词
Energy efficiency; Delphi Technique; Building sustainability indicators; Uganda; Interrater agreement; Energy assessment tool; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; TOOL; BUILDINGS; AGREEMENT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103182
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The growing emphasis on energy efficiency within the built environment, driven by global concerns over climate change, has resulted in notable shifts in building energy consumption patterns. Achieving reductions in building energy use and COQ emissions through sustainable strategies necessitates the development of country-specific policies. While numerous energy assessment tools are available internationally, they often lack contextual relevance for Uganda and many Sub-Saharan African countries.Therefore, there is a pressing need for a tool tailored to Uganda's distinct climatic conditions. This study aimed to identify key building sustainability indicators to promote energy efficiency in Ugandan buildings. Utilizing the Delphi Technique, experts from academia, construction, energy consulting, and government agencies evaluated 35 building indicators over two assessment rounds. The consensus among experts was validated using the Interrater Agreement, with a significant Kendall's W value exceeding 0.6, rising from 0.655 in the first round to 0.704 in the second. Construction consultants showed the highest W value (0.77) in the second round, followed by energy consultants (0.74), while academicians had the lowest (0.7). The Chi-square test demonstrated strong agreement in ranking indicators across 34 degrees of freedom. The most significant indicators identified include "B20 - Optimization of energy use," "B8 - Advanced design and construction technology," and "B27 - Natural ventilation design," among others. The Delphi Technique was instrumental in achieving expert consensus, while interrater agreement was used to validate and ensure the reliability of the findings. The developed framework provides critical insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers seeking to advance energy efficiency and sustainability within Uganda's built environment.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying and prioritizing sustainability indicators for China's assessing demolition waste management using modified Delphi-analytic hierarchy process method
    Han, Dongchen
    Kalantari, Mohsen
    Rajabifard, Abbas
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2023, 41 (11) : 1649 - 1660
  • [2] Prioritizing Sustainability Indicators: Using Materiality Analysis to Guide Sustainability Assessment and Strategy
    Whitehead, Jay
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (03) : 399 - 412
  • [3] Indicators of lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain: Survey of an expert panel with the Delphi technique
    Wilde, Viktoria E.
    Ford, Jon J.
    McMeeken, Joan M.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 87 (10): : 1348 - 1361
  • [4] A mixed methods approach to prioritizing components of Uganda's eHealth environment
    Mukooyo, Eddie Sefululya
    Lutwama, Andrew
    Munabi, Ian Guyton
    Sewankambo, Nelson
    Aceng, Ruth Jane
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 22
  • [5] Methodology matters - VIII - Eliciting expert opinion using the Delphi technique: identifying performance indicators for cardiovascular disease
    Normand, SLT
    McNeil, BJ
    Peterson, LE
    Palmer, RH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1998, 10 (03) : 247 - 260
  • [6] Sustainability in the conservation of the built environment: An economist's perspective
    Throsby, D
    MANAGING CHANGE: SUSTAINABLE APPROACHES TO THE CONSERVATION OF THE BUILT ENVRIONMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 3 - 10
  • [7] An Integrated Framework for Prioritizing Sustainability Indicators for the Mining Sector with a Multicriteria Decision-Making Technique
    Prasad V.
    Bandyopadhyay G.
    Adhikari K.
    Gupta S.
    Operations Research Forum, 4 (1)
  • [8] Built environment sustainability: what's new and what's next?
    Gunatilake, Sachie
    Perera, B. A. K. S.
    BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROJECT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2018, 8 (05) : 430 - 433
  • [9] Improving local measures of sustainability: A study of built-environment indicators in the United States
    Lynch, Amyl
    Mosbah, Simon M.
    CITIES, 2017, 60 : 301 - 313
  • [10] Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) approach in buildings renovation for the sustainability of the built environment: A review
    Kylili, Angeliki
    Fokaides, Paris A.
    Lopez Jimenez, Petra Amparo
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 : 906 - 915