Collapse mechanism of steel two-tiered braced frames under cyclic load

被引:0
|
作者
Cai Z. [1 ]
Ran H. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an
[2] Key Lab of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Ministry of Education, Xi'an
关键词
collapse mechanism; experimental study; finite element analysis; hysteretic behavior; steel two-tiered braced frames;
D O I
10.11918/202201046
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The hysteretic behavior and collapse mechanism of steel two-tiered braced frames (STBF) under rare earthquake was studied. Quasi-static test was conducted on a 1/2-scale STBF, and numerical simulation was carried out for 31 validated models of STBF. The failure mode, deformation, and internal force of STBF under cyclic load were analyzed. The influences of parameters on the collapse mechanism of STBF were investigated, including the load on the top of the column, slenderness ratio, diameter-thickness ratio, and tier-height ratio of braced frames. Results show that the bracing failure of STBF under cyclic load was primarily in one tier. The tier underwent a larger buckling deformation outside the brace plane, which might develop to fracture failure. The column experienced in-plane bending moment due to the asynchronous failure of upper and lower braces. With the increase in the tier-height ratio, the energy dissipation capacity of STBF increased. When the axial compression ratio was larger than 0. 5 or the tier-height ratio of the braced frame was less than 0. 5, STBF was damaged prematurely due to the instability of columns. Therefore, it is recommended that the axial compression ratio of the column should not be larger than 0. 5, and the tier-height ratio should not be less than 0. 5. © 2022 Harbin Institute of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 129
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] LI Lingsong, Comparative study on elastic-plastic time-history analysis and shaking table test of single-span single-story steel structures of gabled frame [D], (2008)
  • [2] YIN Zhilin, PEI Zhiwen, OU Yongcheng, Performance of energy dissipation brace under low cyclic loading [J], Journal of Building Structures, 4, (1986)
  • [3] HONG J K., Development of a seismic design procedure for metal building systems, (2007)
  • [4] XU Yong, CHEN Yiyi, CHENG Xin, Et al., Experimental research on hysteretic behavior of light-weight steel portal frame [J], Journal of Building Structures, 31, 10, (2010)
  • [5] GHABUSSI A, MARNANI J A, ROHANIMANESH M S., Improving seismic performance of portal frame structures with steel curved dampers, Structures, 24, (2020)
  • [6] DUBINA D, STRATAN A, NAGY Z., Full-scale tests on cold-formed steel pitched-roof portal frames with bolted joints [J], Advanced Steel Construction, 5, 2, (2009)
  • [7] WANG Zhenshan, SU Mingzhou, MA Hui, Et al., Research on the influence of joint connection forms on the hysteretic behavior of light-weight portal frame [J], Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 35, 4, (2015)
  • [8] HWANG J S, CHANG K C, LEE G C, Et al., Shaking table tests of pinned-base steel gable frame [J], Journal of Structural Engineering, 115, 12, (1989)
  • [9] HWANG J S, CHANG K C, LEE G C., Seismic behavior of gable frame consisting of tapered members, Journal of Structural Engineering, 117, 3, (1991)
  • [10] SU Mingzhou, WANG Zhenshan, WANG Qian, Et al., Shaking table test on single-story single-bay light-weight portal frames with tapered members, China Civil Engineering Journal, 45, 10, (2012)