COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO COMPOSITE SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION.

被引：0
|
作者：
Salvaderi, Luigi [1 ]
Billinton, Roy [1 ]
机构：
[1] Ente Nationale per l'Energia, Elettrica, Italy, Ente Nationale per l'Energia Elettrica, Italy
来源：
IEEE transactions on power apparatus and systems | 1985年 / PAS-104卷 / 12期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
14
引用
收藏
页码：3486 / 3492
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO COMPOSITE SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION
    SALVADERI, L
    BILLINTON, R
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 104 (12): : 3486 - 3492
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF 3 FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT METHODS FOR GENERATING CAPACITY RELIABILITY EVALUATION
    GOEL, L
    BILLINTON, R
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1994, 29 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [3] ADEQUACY INDICES FOR COMPOSITE GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION.
    Billinton, R.
    Medicherla, T.K.P.
    Sachdev, M.S.
    1979,
  • [4] HAZARD CONTROL SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION.
    Capps, J.H.
    Professional safety, 1981, 26 (03): : 20 - 26
  • [5] APPLICATION OF COMMON-CAUSE OUTAGE MODELS IN COMPOSITE SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION.
    Billinton, R.
    Medicherla, T.K.P.
    Sachdev, M.S.
    1979,
  • [6] LOAD MODELING IN POWER SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION.
    Billinton, Roy
    Endrenyi, J.
    1976,
  • [7] No "One Best" volunteer management and organizing: Two fundamentally different approaches
    Meijs, Lucas C. P. M.
    Ten Hoorn, Esther M.
    CHALLENGES IN VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT, 2008, : 29 - 50
  • [8] Comparison of Silicon Nanocrystals Prepared by Two Fundamentally Different Methods
    Cibulka, Ondrej
    Vorkoetter, Christoph
    Purkrt, Adam
    Holovsky, Jakub
    Benedikt, Jan
    Herynkova, Katerina
    NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11
  • [9] Comparison of Silicon Nanocrystals Prepared by Two Fundamentally Different Methods
    Ondřej Cibulka
    Christoph Vorkötter
    Adam Purkrt
    Jakub Holovský
    Jan Benedikt
    Kateřina Herynková
    Nanoscale Research Letters, 2016, 11
  • [10] Comparison of three different staining methods for microleakage evaluation.
    Stark, H
    Cannon, M
    Jurado, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A417 - A417
12345