Typed dependency relations for syntactic analysis of Thai sentences

被引：0

作者：

Potisuk, Siripong ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Citadel, Military College of South Carolina, 171 Moultrie Street, Charleston, SC 29409, United States

来源：

PACLIC 24 - Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation | 2010年

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：511 / 518

共 50 条

[1] Typed Dependency Relations for Syntactic Analysis of Thai Sentences
Potisuk, Siripong
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH PACIFIC ASIA CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE, INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 2010, : 511 - 518
[2] A Dependency Analysis Method for Japanese Sentences with Complex Conjunctive Relations
Zhou, Huiwei
Yu, Tong
Huang, Degen
Feng, Qiuxiang
2008 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SECURITY, 2008, : 184 - 187
[3] ALGORITHM OF SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF SENTENCES
ANNO, EI
NAUCHNO-TEKHNICHESKAYA INFORMATSIYA SERIYA 2-INFORMATSIONNYE PROTSESSY I SISTEMY, 1975, (07): : 16 - 20
[4] Using stress to disambiguate spoken Thai sentences containing syntactic ambiguity
Potisuk, S
Harper, MP
Gandour, J
ICSLP 96 - FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPOKEN LANGUAGE PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-4, 1996, : 805 - 808
[5] Dependency Relations in the Syntactic Structure of Tunisian Arabic
Jouini, Kemel
ARAB WORLD ENGLISH JOURNAL, 2012, 3 (04) : 36 - 57
[6] A PROGRAM FOR SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH SENTENCES
DEWAR, H
BRATLEY, P
THORNE, JP
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1969, 12 (08) : 476 - &
[7] Syntactic analysis and countermeasures of ambiguous sentences
高子芮
校园英语, 2019, (17) : 231 - 232
[8] COMPLEX SENTENCES - ACQUISITION OF SYNTACTIC CONNECTIVES AND THE SEMANTIC RELATIONS THEY ENCODE
BLOOM, L
LAHEY, M
HOOD, L
LIFTER, K
FIESS, K
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 1980, 7 (02) : 235 - 261
[9] TOWARDS SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF COORDINATIVE SENTENCES OF GERMAN
HESSE, H
KUSTNER, A
JOURNAL OF LINGUISTIC CALCULUS, 1980, (04): : 5 - 33
[10] The rise and fall of typed sentences
Crabbé, M
JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 2000, 65 (04) : 1858 - 1862

← 1 2 3 4 5 →