Completeness Measurement and Identification of Geometric Error of Rotary Axis of Boring Machine

被引:0
|
作者
Guo S. [1 ,2 ]
Ding Q. [1 ,2 ]
Zou Y. [1 ,2 ]
Sa R. [1 ,2 ]
Tang S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] College of Mechanical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University oj Technology, Huhhot
[2] Key Laboratory of Special Service Robot of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Huhhot
关键词
completeness measurement; formation mechanism; geometric error; horizontal boring machine; identification; rotary axis;
D O I
10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2024.01.043
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To address the problem that the number of geometric errors were inconsistent and incompleteness which needed to be measured for the rotary axis of four axis horizontal boring machine, an analyzing methodology of PIGEs formation mechanism based on the shape generation function and a method of the completeness measuring, identifying geometric errors of the rotary axis were proposed for a four axis horizontal boring machine. Firstly, the generation function of PIGEs of horizontal boring machines was constructed based on the shape generation mechanism, and the minimum number of position-independent geometric error (PIGEs) that the rotary axis can be adjusted through error compensation was determined. Secondly, the completeness function model was established consisted of four terms PIGEs, six terms position-dependent geometric error (PDGEs), six terms setup error (SEs) and DBB measurement track radius length of the rotary axis of horizontal boring machine, the Viviani curve measurement track based on DBB was designed based four-axis synchronized motion, and the NURBS characterization of six item PDGEs, identification methods of PIGEs, and SEs of the rotary axis were constructed. Finally, the comparative experiment by error compensating was carried out. The results showed that the error compensation using the geometric error completeness measurement and identification results included four terms PIGEs, six terms PDGEs, and six terms SEs can improve the measurement accuracy of circular trajectory by 40. 69% compared with that of compensate six PDGEs simply. © 2024 Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 458
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] TANG Z, ZHOU Y, WANG S, Et al., An innovative geometric error compensation of the multi-axis CNG machine tools with nonrotary cutters to the accurate worm grinding of spur face gears[J], Mechanism and Machine Theory, 169, (2022)
  • [2] OSEI S, WANG W, DING Q., A new" method to identify the position-independent geometric errors in the rotary axes of five-axis machine tools[J], Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 87, pp. 46-53, (2023)
  • [3] LEI M H, YANG J, GAO F, Et al., Closed-loop thermal error control with a physical-based ensemble model for the precision spindle of a machine tool, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 125, pp. 1859-1877, (2023)
  • [4] LIU Qiang, Development history and future trends of numerical control machine tools [J], China Mechanical Engineering, 32, 7, pp. 757-770, (2021)
  • [5] XIANG S T, ALTINTAS Y., Modeling and compensation of volumetric errors for five-axis machine tools [J], International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 101, pp. 65-78, (2016)
  • [6] LIN Z, TIAN W, ZHANG D, Et al., A method of geometric error identification and compensation of CNC machine tools based on volumetric diagonal error measurements, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 124, 1 - 2, pp. 51-68, (2023)
  • [7] FAN J, YE Q., Research on geometric error modeling and compensation method of CNC precision cylindrical grinding machine based on differential motion theory and Jaeobian matrix [J], The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 120, pp. 1805-1819, (2022)
  • [8] YANG J, DING H., A new position independent geometric errors identification model of five-axis serial machine tools based on differential motion matrices [J], International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 104, pp. 68-77, (2016)
  • [9] IBARAKI S, KNAPP W., Indirect measurement of volumetric accuracy for three-axis and five-axis machine tools
  • [10] a review, International Journal of Automation Technology, 6, 2, pp. 110-124, (2012)