Model for civil aviation emergency plan evaluation based on hybrid information representations

被引：0
|
作者：
Xiong S. [1 ]
Li H. [1 ]
Wu Y. [1 ]
Chen Z. [2 ]
机构：
[1] College of Civil Aviation Safety Engineering, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan
[2] School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan
来源：
Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS | 2019年 / 25卷 / 07期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Civil emergency plan; Entropy weight method; Hybrid information representation; Multi-attribute group decision making; Weighted TOPSIS method;
D O I：
10.13196/j.cims.2019.07.019
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In terms of the civil aviation emergency plan evaluation based on hybrid representations of intuitionistic fuzzy number, interval-value fuzzy number and hesitant fuzzy element, a novel Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making (MAGDM) method with completely unknown weights was proposed. The evaluation index system of civil aviation emergency plan was first constructed from the perspective of the content of emergency plan. Moreover, an improved iterative entropy weight method was utilized to simultaneously determine the weights of attributes and decision makers. The final ranking of civil aviation emergency plan was obtained on the basis of the weighted TOPSIS method. The feasibility and rationality of the proposed model were demonstrated with a case study as well as a comparison. © 2019, Editorial Department of CIMS. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1784 / 1794
页数：10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Yang C., Wu T., General aviation service and guarantee system of low airspace reform in China, Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 25, 1, pp. 50-52, (2014)
  • [2] Chang J., Chen Z., Zhou G., Et al., The multi-index risk evaluation of railway emergency plans based on prospect theory, Journal of The China Railway Society, 38, 2, pp. 7-18, (2016)
  • [3] Chang J., Zhou G., Chen Z., Et al., Evaluation of railway emergency plans considering experts' behavior preferences and indexes correlation, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 22, 5, pp. 1371-1385, (2016)
  • [4] Alexander D., Towards the development of a standard in emergency planning, Disaster Prevention & Management, 14, 2, pp. 158-175, (2013)
  • [5] Perry R.W., Lindell M.K., Preparedness for emergency response: guidelines for the emergency planning process, Disasters, 27, 4, pp. 336-350, (2003)
  • [6] Zhang Y., Research on implementation effect evaluation model of emergency plans based on improved multi-level and grey evaluation method, Natural Science Journal of Xiangtan University, 39, 1, pp. 114-118, (2017)
  • [7] Liu J., Zhang P., Chen Z., Et al., Study on evaluation method of natural disaster emergency plan in china(Part Ⅰ): completeness evaluation, China Safety Science Journal, 18, 2, pp. 5-11, (2008)
  • [8] Liu J., Zhu J., Zhang P., Et al., Study on evaluation method of natural disaster emergency plan in china(Part Ⅱ): responsibility matrix evaluation, China Safety Science Journal, 18, 4, pp. 5-15, (2008)
  • [9] Zhou W.T., Wang H., Wang J., Zhu Y.L., Pan Z.J., Research on constructing semantic model of emergency decision-making plan for civil aviation, Application Research of Computers, 30, 1, pp. 194-195, (2013)
  • [10] Wang Z., Research on ATC collaborative emergency management mechanism and system realize, (2016)
12345