Effect of water vapor from power station flue gas on CO2 capture by vacuum swing adsorption with activated carbon

被引:0
|
作者
Xu D. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang J. [2 ]
Li G. [2 ]
Xiao P. [2 ]
Webley P. [2 ]
Zhai Y.-C. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Material and Metallurgy, Northeastern University
[2] Department of Chemical Engineering, Monash University
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Activated carbon; Carbon dioxide; Flue gas; Vacuum swing adsorption; Water vapor;
D O I
10.1016/s1872-5813(11)60016-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to the high absolute humidity of real flue gas, activated carbon, a hydrophobic adsorbent, was used to selectively adsorb CO2 by vacuum swing adsorption in this study. The objective of this work is to study the feasibility and advantage of CO2 capture along with simultaneous moisture removal by activated carbon and the effect of H2O on CO2 capture from wet flue gas streams. Through experiment and analysis, the "S" shape isotherms of water indicated water was easier to be desorbed from activated carbon. Then a cone shape model was proposed to depict water distribution inside the adsorption bed. As a consequence, water vapor hardly influenced the CO2 capture performance. Moreover, the process can be operated under a relatively high vacuum pressure and short evacuation time. The preliminary results showed that our one-bed VSA process could yield a good CO2 recovery of over 80% and a reasonable purity of 43%.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 174
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Jose D.F., Timothy F., Sean P., Howard M., Rameshwar D.S., Advances in CO<sub>2</sub> capture technology-The U. S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program, J Greenhouse Gas Control, 2, 1, pp. 9-20, (2008)
  • [2] Meisen A., Shuai X., Research and development issues in CO<sub>2</sub> capture, Energy Convers Manage, 38, 1, pp. 37-42, (1997)
  • [3] Gielen D., Capture and Major Point Sources, (2003)
  • [4] Anderson S., Newell R., Prospects for carbon capture and storage technologies, Annu Rev Environ Resourc, 29, pp. 109-142, (2004)
  • [5] Fei W.-Y., Ai N., Chen J., Capture and separation of greenhouse gas-challenge and change faced by separation technology, Chemical Industry and Engineering Process, 24, 1, pp. 1-4, (2005)
  • [6] Gomes V.G., Yee K.W., Pressure swing adsorption for carbon dioxide sequestration from exhaust gases, Sep Purif Technol, 28, 2, pp. 161-170, (2002)
  • [7] Ko D., Siriwardane R., Biegler L.T., Optimization of pressure swing adsorption and fractionated vacuum pressure swing adsorption processes for CO<sub>2</sub> capture, Ind Eng Chem Res, 44, 21, pp. 8084-8094, (2005)
  • [8] Ho M.T., Allinson G.W., Wiley D.E., Reducing the cost of CO<sub>2</sub> capture from flue gases using pressure swing adsorption, Ind Eng Chem Res, 47, 14, pp. 4883-4890, (2008)
  • [9] Chue K.T., Kim J.N., Yoo Y.J., Cho S.H., Yang R.T., Comparison of activated carbon and zeolite 13X for CO<sub>2</sub> recovery from flue gas by pressure swing adsorption, Ind Eng Chem Res, 34, 2, pp. 591-598, (1995)
  • [10] Sircar S., Golden T.C., Rao M.B., Activated carbon for gas separation and storage, Carbon, 34, 1, pp. 1-12, (1996)