Analysis the influence of pyramidal error on the encoder accuracy test by using coordinate transformation

被引:0
|
作者
Tian, Liude [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Chaohui [1 ]
Zhao, Jianke [1 ]
Duan, Yaxuan [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Liang [1 ]
Zhao, Huaixue [1 ]
Long, Jiangbo [1 ]
Zhou, Yan [1 ]
Li, Kun [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an,Shaanxi,710119, China
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing,100049, China
来源
Guangxue Xuebao/Acta Optica Sinica | 2015年 / 35卷 / 05期
关键词
Coordinate measuring machines - Geometry - Signal encoding - Error analysis;
D O I
10.3788/AOS201535.0512003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to realize the high precision measurement of encoder accuracy, the principle and method to measure encoder accuracy by using polyhedron and autocollimator are introduced. The polyhedron coordinate system and autocollimator measurement coordinate system are established, and the precise mathematical model is established, which is relation with the measurement error of the encoder accuracy and pyramidal error. The simulation results show that the encoder shaft tilt angle and tilt direction will affect the measurement results of the encoder accuracy. Measurement error of encoder accuracy increases with encoder shaft tilt angle, and approximately proportional to the square. Measurement error of encoder accuracy changes with encoder shaft tilt direction. When encoder shaft tilt direction is 0° or 180°, measurement error is the smallest; When encoder shaft tilt direction is 90° or 270°, measurement error is the maximum. As encoder shaft tilt angle is 5′, the measurement errors can reach 0.11″~0.48″, which cannot be ignored for encoder with 1~3 levels of precision grade. Pyramidal error should be cotrolled in the appropriate range based on the precision grade of measured encoder. Specific requirements on pyramidal error are given for encoders with different precision grades. ©, 2015, Chinese Optical Society. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Compression of a pyramidal absorber using multiple discrete coordinate transformation
    Tang, Wenxuan
    Yang, Rui
    Hao, Yang
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2014, 22 (08): : 9033 - 9047
  • [2] Error analysis and accuracy evaluation method for coordinate measurement in transformed coordinate system
    Gu, Yunfan
    Wu, Jing
    Liu, Chenyu
    MEASUREMENT, 2025, 242
  • [3] Influence of geometrical distribution of common points on the accuracy of coordinate transformation
    Tan, Qimeng
    Lu, Naiguang
    Dong, Mingli
    Zhu, Lianqing
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2013, 221 : 411 - 423
  • [4] The Coordinate Transformation Method and Accuracy Analysis in GPS Measurement
    Yuan, Debao
    Cui, Xi-min
    Wang, Sheng-yao
    Qiu, Ya-hui
    Wang, Guo
    Jin, Jing-jing
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOL 12, PT A, 2012, 12 : 232 - 237
  • [5] NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF INTERNAL NUMBER REPRESENTATION ON ACCURACY OF COORDINATE TRANSFORMATION OF INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS.
    Duelen, G.
    Held, J.
    Kirchhoff, U.
    Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 1986, 3 (01) : 11 - 13
  • [6] Using the histogram test to quantify reaction coordinate error
    Peters, Baron
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 125 (24):
  • [7] Error analysis of the 3D similarity coordinate transformation
    Guobin Chang
    Tianhe Xu
    Qianxin Wang
    GPS Solutions, 2017, 21 : 963 - 971
  • [8] Error analysis of the 3D similarity coordinate transformation
    Chang, Guobin
    Xu, Tianhe
    Wang, Qianxin
    GPS SOLUTIONS, 2017, 21 (03) : 963 - 971
  • [9] Accuracy of stereotactic coordinate transformation using a localisation frame and computed tomographic imaging Part II. Analysis of matrix-based coordinate transformation
    P. Grunert
    Neurosurgical Review, 1999, 22 : 188 - 203
  • [10] Accuracy of stereotactic coordinate transformation using a localisation frame and computed tomographic imaging Part II. Analysis of matrix-based coordinate transformation
    Grunert, P
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 22 (04) : 188 - 203