Can option trading volume forecast volatility? Evidence from Shanghai Stock Exchange 50ETF option

被引:0
|
作者
Wan D. [1 ]
Tian Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Finance, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou
关键词
Chinese option market; deep out-of-the-money option; HAR model; realized volatility; volatility forecasting;
D O I
10.12011/SETP2022-1341
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using daily trading volume of Shanghai Stock Exchange 50ETF option, the paper calculates the volume percentages of out-of-the-money (OTM), at-the-money (ATM), in-the-money (ITM) options and investigates the forecasting ability of each kind of option trading on the realized volatility of underlying ETF. The results show that OTM option trading can significantly promote the predicting power of HAR and HAR-CJ models. Further findings show that, the information of OTM option mainly comes from the deep-out-of-the-money (DOTM) option, while the non-DOTM option has weaker performance in forecasting volatility. Comparing with implied volatility, DOTM option has better performance in in-sample fitting and out-of-sample forecasting volatility. Among the DOTM options, call option has more information than put option, and the call option trading negatively relates to future volatility while the put option trading positively relates to future volatility. These results indicate that informed traders prefer to using DOTM option, and the opposite correlations of DOTM call and put option with future volatility are consistent with leverage effect. Our findings can be applied in improving current volatility forecasting models, and can also be helpful in optimizing governors’ risk monitoring systems. © 2023 Systems Engineering Society of China. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 771
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Seo S W, Kim J S., The information content of option-implied information for volatility forecasting with investor sentiment[J], Journal of Banking & Finance, 50, pp. 106-120, (2015)
  • [2] Andrei D, Hasler M., Investor attention and stock market volatility[J], The Review of Financial Studies, 28, 1, pp. 33-72, (2015)
  • [3] Busch T, Christensen B J, Nielsen M., The role of implied volatility in forecasting future realized volatility and jumps in foreign exchange, stock, and bond markets[J], Journal of Econometrics, 160, 1, pp. 48-57, (2011)
  • [4] Pan J, Poteshman A M., The information in option volume for future stock prices[J], The Review of Financial Studies, 19, 3, pp. 871-908, (2006)
  • [5] Ge L, Lin T C, Pearson N D., Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns?[J], Journal of Financial Economics, 120, 3, pp. 601-622, (2016)
  • [6] Zheng Z L, Lu K, Lin C X., The information content of volume: Evidence from Taiwan option market[J], Journal of Financial Research, 6, pp. 178-192, (2012)
  • [7] Qiao G, Teng Y, Li W, Et al., Improving volatility forecasting based on Chinese volatility index information: Evidence from CSI 300 index and futures markets[J], The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 49, pp. 133-151, (2019)
  • [8] Zheng Z L, Xu Y, Chen R., Information content of options’ net buying pressure[J], Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2021, 6, pp. 42-56
  • [9] Engle R F., Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation[J], Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50, 4, pp. 987-1008, (1981)
  • [10] Bollerslev T., Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity[J], Journal of Econometric, 31, 3, pp. 307-327, (1986)