A novel equipment contribution evaluation framework for ESoS from a comprehensive perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Jingru [1 ]
Fang, Zhigeng [1 ]
Dong, Wenjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Node contribution analysis; Equipment system of systems (ESoS); Graphical evaluation and review technique; (GERT); Mason's rule; Stochastic network; STRUCTURAL ROBUSTNESS; GRAPHICAL EVALUATION; NETWORK; GERT; RETURN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126042
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Modern military operations are dynamic processes involving heterogeneous systems connected via multiple channels, which can be abstracted as equipment system of systems (ESoS). The system contribution rate evaluation in ESoS, which aids how to wisely choose which equipment should have first access to technical enhancement given limited resources, is of significant study value. It has been discussed in the literature, and multiple effective methods have been proposed. Nevertheless, most of them focused on a single perspective (i.e., effectiveness, capability). And mathematical modeling of ESoS networks with stochastic features remains a challenging research area. This paper proposes a framework that can address equipment contribution from the perspective of ESoS structure and operational effect. Using the graphical evaluation and review technique (GERT), the operational process with stochastic characteristics is networked modeling. Based on this model, multi-metric assessments, including performing tasks' success probability, operational time and completion degree for effectiveness contribution and importance indicators for structural contribution, are developed. Finally, a computational study is conducted to verify the application of the proposed framework. Results demonstrate that instead of giving one result such as either completion degree or time, a GERT method with Mason's formula assists decision-makers in simultaneously obtaining multiple outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Internationalization from the Perspective of Quality Assurance and Enhancement: A Comprehensive Framework for Internationalization through Novel Lens "Flow of Quality"
    Velkoska, Cvetanka
    Nuredin, Abdulmecit
    JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND LEADERSHIP STUDIES, 2024, 5 (03):
  • [2] A fuzzy analysis framework for waste incineration power plant comprehensive benefit evaluation from refuse classification perspective
    Wu, Yunna
    Tao, Yao
    Deng, Zhongqing
    Zhou, Jianli
    Xu, Chuanbo
    Zhang, Buyuan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 258
  • [3] Comprehensive Framework for Preventive Maintenance Priority of Medical Equipment
    Saleh, Neven
    Balestra, Gabriella
    2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2015, : 1227 - 1230
  • [4] Equipment Development Risk Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation
    苏续军
    荣丽卿
    王亚彬
    史宪铭
    JournalofDonghuaUniversity(EnglishEdition), 2015, 32 (06) : 998 - 1000
  • [5] Streamlining Complex Intervention Evaluation Through Participatory Systems Mapping and Contribution Analysis: A Comprehensive Framework for Actionable Complexity Evaluation
    Bouyousfi, Salah Eddine
    Ouedraogo, Miche
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2025, 46 (01) : 6 - 21
  • [6] A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of ontology modularization
    Oh, Sunjoo
    Yeom, Heon Y.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (10) : 8547 - 8556
  • [7] TEACHER EVALUATION - A COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK FOR SUPERVISORS
    MURPHY, J
    JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL EVALUATION IN EDUCATION, 1987, 1 (02): : 157 - 180
  • [9] COMPARE:: A comprehensive framework for architecture evaluation
    Briand, LC
    Carrière, SJ
    Kazman, R
    Wüst, J
    OBJECT-ORIENTED TECHNOLOGY: ECOOP'98 WORKSHOP READER, 1998, 1543 : 48 - 49
  • [10] A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of metacommunity structure
    Presley, Steven J.
    Higgins, Christopher L.
    Willig, Michael R.
    OIKOS, 2010, 119 (06) : 908 - 917