共 50 条
Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future
被引:0
|作者:
Pereira, Vijay
[1
]
Nair, Asha K. S.
[2
]
Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar
[3
]
机构:
[1] NEOMA Business Sch, Reims Campus, Reims, France
[2] PSG Coll Technol, PSG Inst Management, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Indian Inst Management Nagpur, Nagpur, India
来源:
关键词:
Innovation for sustainability;
Eco-innovation;
Environmental innovation;
Green innovation;
Sustainable innovation;
Bibliometric study;
Co-citation analysis;
Co-word analysis;
Thematic evolution;
Integrated framework;
GREEN PRODUCT INNOVATION;
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;
FIRM PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE;
HUMAN-RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT;
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT;
ECO-INNOVATION;
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION;
INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE;
EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE;
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103127
中图分类号:
T [工业技术];
学科分类号:
08 ;
摘要:
Innovation and sustainability are distinct but complementary topics, and hence, complex, multidimensional, and multidisciplinary. It is thus natural that research on 'innovation for sustainability', though important, is largely scattered and unstructured. This article aims to rectify this gap by developing a systematic study, quantitatively depicting the knowledge structure and the intellectual progress of innovation for sustainability in the business management literature. To this end, we applied bibliometric analysis to study 1842 innovation for sustainability articles from the 'Web of Science' database. Our robust methodology included deploying the document cocitation analysis, co-word analysis, and thematic evolution to trace the intellectual structure and conceptual structure of the innovation for sustainability field. Further, through a thorough qualitative content analysis, we developed a comprehensive conceptual framework comprising drivers, innovation practices, and performance indicators of innovation for sustainability. Additionally, we examined the latest trending articles based on total local citations (TLC) and total global citations (TGC) to delineate the potential future research directions. Overall, thus, this research contributed to the innovation for sustainability literature by combining a tripartite methodology of bibliometric analysis, qualitative content analysis, and analysis of trending articles to determine the intellectual structure and potential future research directions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文