Estimating Methane Emission Durations Using Continuous Monitoring Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Daniels, William S. [1 ]
Jia, Meng [1 ]
Hammerling, Dorit M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Energy Emiss Modeling & Data Lab, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS | 2024年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
methane; oil and gas; emission detection; emission duration; emission frequency; continuousmonitoring systems; greenhouse gas reporting; OIL;
D O I
10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00687
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We propose a method for estimating methane emission durations on oil and gas sites, referred to as the Probabilistic Duration Model (PDM), that uses concentration data from continuous monitoring systems (CMS). The PDM probabilistically addresses a key limitation of CMS: nondetect times, or the times when wind blows emitted methane away from the CMS sensors (resulting in no detections). Output from the PDM can be used to bound the duration of emissions detected by survey-based technologies, such as plane or satellites, that have limited ability to characterize durations due to the typically low temporal frequency (e.g., quarterly) at which they observe a given source. Linear regression indicates that the PDM has a bias of -4.9% (R2 = 0.80) when evaluated on blinded controlled releases at the Methane Emissions Technology Evaluation Center (METEC), with 86.8% of estimates within a factor of 2x error from the true duration. We apply the PDM to a typical production site in the Appalachian Basin and use it to bound the duration of survey-based measurements. We find that failing to account for CMS nondetect times results in underestimated emission durations of up to a factor of 65x (6400%) on this site.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1192
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Continuous emission monitoring systems: An overview
    Mandel, SB
    CONTROL ENGINEERING, 1996, 43 (06) : 47 - 48
  • [2] Assessing Detection Efficiencies for Continuous Methane Emission Monitoring Systems at Oil and Gas Production Sites
    Chen, Qining
    Schissel, Colette
    Kimura, Yosuke
    McGaughey, Gary
    McDonald-Buller, Elena
    Allen, David T.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (04) : 1788 - 1796
  • [3] RELIABLE CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS FOR LEGAL STACK EMISSION SURVEILLANCE
    GREEN, R
    GLASS TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 31 (02): : 41 - 44
  • [4] Continuous emission monitoring and accounting automated systems at an HPP
    Roslyakov P.V.
    Ionkin I.L.
    Kondrateva O.E.
    Borovkova A.M.
    Seregin V.A.
    Morozov I.V.
    Therm. Eng., 3 (220-226): : 220 - 226
  • [5] Continuous emission monitoring
    Anon
    World Cement, 1999, 30 (06): : 79 - 81
  • [6] Research on Particulate Material Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Calibration
    Wang, Qiang
    Zhou, Gang
    Zhong, Qi
    Zhang, Yang
    Yang, Kai
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND RESOURCES EXPLOITATION, PTS 1-3, 2013, 807-809 : 139 - 143
  • [7] Software-supported uprating of availability for continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) using predictive systems (PEMS)
    Thull, B.
    Waeber, M.
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2017, 77 (06): : 257 - 260
  • [8] Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems (PEMS) - An alternative to continuous emission measurement with Automated Measuring Systems (AMS)
    Nestler, Maik
    VDI Berichte, 2022, 2022 (2397): : 213 - 226
  • [9] Modeling financial durations using penalized estimating functions
    Zhang, Yaohua
    Zou, Jian
    Ravishanker, Nalini
    Thavaneswaran, Aerambamoorthy
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2019, 131 : 145 - 158
  • [10] Continuous Emission Monitoring of Tetrafluoromethane Using Quantum Cascade Lasers
    Geiser, Peter
    Avetisov, Viacheslav
    Espinoza-Nava, Luis
    Menegazzo, Nicola
    Kaspersen, Peter
    PHOTONICS, 2016, 3 (02)