Ballistic Performance of Ceramic/Metal Composite Armor Systems with Different Thickness Ratios

被引:0
|
作者
Si P. [1 ]
Bai F. [1 ]
Liu Y. [1 ,2 ]
Yan J. [1 ]
Huang F. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Explosive Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing
[2] Chongqing Innovation Center, Beijing Institute of Technology, Chongqing
来源
Binggong Xuebao/Acta Armamentarii | 2022年 / 43卷 / 09期
关键词
ballistic performance; ceramic/metal composite armor; interface defeat; thickness ratio;
D O I
10.12382/bgxb.2021.0844
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ballistic performance of ceramic armor systems with different structures is studied to optimize the structural design of the armor. The FEM-SPH coupling calculation model is verified through ballistic experiments and numerical simulations. The process of a long-rod projectile impacting a ceramic-metal composite armor is then simulated, and the influence of different thickness ratios of ceramic to the metal back plate on interface breakdown analyzed. The results show two main protective mechanisms of the ceramic composite armor. When the projectile velocity’s is less than 1 000 m/s and the ceramic thickness is increased from 15 mm to 25 mm for a bi-layer ceramic composite armor with a total thickness of 30 mm, the dwell time of the composite armor would be more than doubled, and the maximum energy consumption of the projectile body can reach 50%. When the velocity of the projectile exceeds 1 000 m/s, the energy consumption is dominant in the penetration phase, and the maximum energy absorption during penetration is 85%. When the composite armor has a metal to ceramic thickness ratio of 2: 1, the missile body stays longer on the interface and achieves a relatively high ballistic protection efficiency. Our results can be used as a reference for the design of armor structures. © 2022 China Ordnance Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2318 / 2329
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] TAN M T, ZHANG X F, BAO K, Et al., Investigation of stress distribution in multi-layered targets under impact load by using receding contact method, Composite Structures, 252, (2020)
  • [2] LUNDBERG P, LUNDBERG B., Transition between interface defeat and penetration for tungsten projectiles and four silicon carbide materials, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 31, 7, pp. 781-792, (2005)
  • [3] HOLMQUIST T J, ANDERSON C E, BEHER T, Et al., Mechanics of dwell and post-dwell penetration, Advances in Applied Ceramics, 109, 8, pp. 467-479, (2013)
  • [4] LI J C, CHEN X W., Theoretical analysis on transition from interface defeat to penetration in the impact of conical-nosed long rods onto ceramic targets, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 130, pp. 203-213, (2019)
  • [5] LI J C, CHEN X W, NING F, Et al., On the transition from interface defeat to penetration in the impact of long rod onto ceramic targets, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 83, pp. 37-46, (2015)
  • [6] ZHAI Y X, WU H, FANG Q., Interface defeat studies of long-rod projectile impacting on ceramic targets, Defence Technology, 16, 1, pp. 50-68, (2020)
  • [7] SERJOUEI A, GOUR G, ZHANG X F, Et al., On improving ballistic limit of bi-layer ceramic-metal armor, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 105, pp. 54-67, (2017)
  • [8] GOUR G, IDAPALAPATI S, GOH W, Et al., Equivalent protection factor of bi-layer ceramic metal structures [J], Defence Technology, (2021)
  • [9] BEHNER T, ANDERSON C E, HOLMQUIST T, Et al., Penetration dynamics and interface defeat capability of silicon carbide against long Rod impact, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 38, 6, pp. 419-425, (2011)
  • [10] BEHNER T, HEINE A, WICKERT M., Dwell and penetration of tungsten heavy alloy long-rod penetrators impacting unconfined finite-thickness silicon carbide ceramic targets, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 95, pp. 54-60, (2016)