Numerical simulation of semi-confined slot turbulent impinging jet using different turbulence models

被引:1
|
作者
Wang M.-B. [1 ]
Wang R.-H. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Petroleum Engineering in China University of Petroleum
关键词
Difference scheme; Jets; Numerical simulation; Turbulence model;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2010.04.014
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to meet the need of abandoned platform cutting technology used in offshore petroleum engineering, different turbulence models including the standard k-ε model, RNG k-ε model, Realizable k-ε model and Reynolds stress model were used to simulate the semi-confined slot turbulent impinging jet. In order to reduce the influence of numerical diffusion on the computational results, measures such as decreasing the mesh size and increasing the precision of difference scheme were used. The results show that the Reynolds stress model and the Realizable k-ε turbulence model perform better than other two models. Decreasing the mesh size does not reduce the effect of numerical viscosity on computational results, and increasing the precision of difference scheme can reduce the effect of numerical viscosity on computational results at certain degree. And the Realizable k-ε turbulence model in conjunction with MUSCL scheme shows a little better performance than other models.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 78
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Craft T.J., Graham L.J.W., Launder B.E., Impinging jet studies for turbulence model assessment-II: An examination of the performance of four turbulence models, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 36, 10, pp. 2685-2697, (1993)
  • [2] Yoshida H., Suenaga K., Echigo R., Turbulence structure and heat transfer of a two-dimensional impinging jet with gas-solid suspensions, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 33, 5, pp. 859-867, (1990)
  • [3] Ashforth-Frost S., Jambunathan K., Numerical prediction of semi-confined jet impingement and comparison with experimental data, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 23, pp. 295-306, (1996)
  • [4] Chen Q.-G., Xu Z., Zhang Y.-J., Comparison of two different schemes and two turbulence models in the numerical computations of an axisymmetric impinging jet flow, Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 21, 1, pp. 82-89, (2003)
  • [5] Xu J.-L., Xu Z., Huang S.-J., Numerical study of slot impinging jet with nonlinear k-ε model, Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 33, 8, (1999)
  • [6] Li G.-S., Yi C., Huang Z.-W., Mechanism and experimental study of self-resonating cavitating jet for improving polluted rock permeability, Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 31, 1, pp. 72-75, (2007)
  • [7] Launder B.E., Spalding D.B., Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence, (1972)
  • [8] Yakhot V., Orszag S.A., Renormalization group analysis of turbulence I: Basic theory, Journal of Scientific Computing, 1, 1, pp. 1-51, (1986)
  • [9] Shih T.-H., Liou W.W., Shabbir A., A new k-ε eddy-viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows, Computers & Fluids, 24, 3, pp. 227-238, (1995)
  • [10] van Leer B., Toward the ultimate conservative difference scheme: A second-order sequel to Godunov's method, Journal of Computational Physics, 32, pp. 101-136, (1979)