XGBoost regression model-based electricity tariff plan recommendation in smart grid environment

被引:3
|
作者
Behera D.K. [1 ]
Das M. [1 ]
Swetanisha S. [2 ]
Nayak J. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Computer Engineering, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) (Deemed to Be University), Patia, Odisha, Bhubaneswar
[2] Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Trident Academy of Technology, Odisha, Bhubaneswar
[3] Department of Computer Science, Maharaja Sriram Chandra BhanjaDeo University, Odisha, Baripada
关键词
electricity tariff plan recommendation; power system; recommender system; smart grid; XGBoost regression model;
D O I
10.1504/IJICA.2022.123223
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Power system deregulation enables the power industry to provide residential customers to choose retailing electricity plan. This allows competition among retailers or traders and also minimises the energy expenditure with quality of services. We have proposed an XGBoost regression model for electricity tariff plan recommendation. Firstly, proposed regression model with basic statistical features is compared with support vector regression (SVR), decision tree (DT), Bayesian ridge and KNN regression model. Secondly, performance of the proposed model is extensively studied by combining the features from other user-based, item-based and matrix factorisation-based techniques. In this research, dataset shared in the project Smart Grid Smart City (SGSC), Australia is used for conducting experimental analysis. A rating inference approach is designed to infer the choice of electricity consumer for a specific retailing plan. The proposed model achieves better performance as compared to other baseline methods. © 2022 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AgentUDE17: A Genetic Algorithm to Optimize the Parameters of an Electricity Tariff in a Smart Grid Environment
    Oezdemir, Serkan
    Unland, Rainer
    ADVANCES IN PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF AGENTS, MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, AND COMPLEXITY: THE PAAMS COLLECTION, 2018, 10978 : 224 - 236
  • [2] Regression model-based hourly aggregated electricity demand prediction
    Panigrahi, Radharani
    Patne, Nita R.
    Pemmada, Sumanth
    Manchalwar, Ashwini D.
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 16 - 24
  • [3] Electricity Plan Recommendation Method Based on Implicit Score of Electricity Plan and User Portrait
    Zhang Z.
    Wang Y.
    Lin Z.
    Ma Y.
    Lu F.
    Yang L.
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023, 47 (04): : 91 - 101
  • [4] Energy technology environment model with smart grid and robust nodal electricity prices
    Babonneau, Frederic
    Haurie, Alain
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 274 (1-2) : 101 - 117
  • [5] Energy technology environment model with smart grid and robust nodal electricity prices
    Frédéric Babonneau
    Alain Haurie
    Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 274 : 101 - 117
  • [6] Proposing a Smart Electricity Pricing Model for Future Smart Grid
    Zahedi, A.
    2014 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC), 2014,
  • [7] Data quality of electricity consumption data in a smart grid environment
    Chen, Wen
    Zhou, Kaile
    Yang, Shanlin
    Wu, Cheng
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 75 : 98 - 105
  • [8] Electricity Price and Demand Forecasting Under Smart Grid Environment
    Masri, Dina
    Zeineldin, Hatem
    Woon, Wei Lee
    2015 IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (IEEE EEEIC 2015), 2015, : 1956 - 1960
  • [9] Electricity Cost Optimization for Data Centers in Smart Grid Environment
    Zhang, Shuben
    Ran, Yongyi
    Wu, Xiaomin
    Yang, Jian
    11TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (ICCA), 2014, : 290 - 295
  • [10] Model-Based Cybersecurity Assessment with NESCOR Smart Grid Failure Scenarios
    Jauhar, Sumeet
    Chen, Binbin
    Temple, William G.
    Dong, Xinshu
    Kalbarczyk, Zbigniew
    Sanders, William H.
    Nicol, David M.
    2015 IEEE 21ST PACIFIC RIM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DEPENDABLE COMPUTING (PRDC), 2015, : 319 - 324