Applying to aerodynamic optimization an enhanced particle swarm optimization algorithm based on parallel exchange

被引:0
|
作者
Wang P. [1 ]
Xia L. [1 ]
Zhou W. [1 ]
Luan W. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi′an
关键词
aerodynamic optimization design; cuckoo search algorithm; global optimization; particle swarm optimization algorithm;
D O I
10.1051/jnwpu/20224030493
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is easy to implement and can obtain high-quality solutions to optimization problems. It is widely applied to nonlinear and difficult problems such as aerodynamic optimization. However, to solve multi-modal problems, it easily falls into locally optimal values, showing that its robustness is poor. In order to improve the robustness of the PSO algorithm, an enhanced particle swarm optimization algorithm based on parallel exchange (EPSOBPE) is proposed. The algorithm enhances the optimization capability and its robustness through the parallel evolution of the cuckoo search algorithm (CSA), PSO population, hierarchical exchange operation and reinforcement learning strategy. Therefore, the algorithm has both the global search capability of the CSA and the local capability of the PSO algorithm, thus making the EPSOBPE very robust. Functional test results show that the EPSOBPE has stronger robustness and adaptability to different problems than other intelligent optimization algorithms. Moreover, the EPSOBPE is applied to the aerodynamic optimization design of the RAE2822 airfoil and the M6 wing. Compared with other algorithms, the EPSOBPE is more robust, and its optimization capability is better. ©2022 Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 503
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] KENNEDY J, EBERHART R., Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942-1948, (1995)
  • [2] YANG X S, DEB S., Cuckoo search via Lévy flights, 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing, pp. 210-214, (2009)
  • [3] STORN R, PRICE K., Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, Journal of Global Optimization, 11, 4, pp. 341-359, (1997)
  • [4] CLERC M, KENNEDY J., The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space, IEEE Trans on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 1, pp. 58-73, (2002)
  • [5] MENDES R, KENNEDY J, NEVES J., The fully informed particle swarm: simpler, maybe better, IEEE Trans on Evolutionary Computation, 8, 3, pp. 204-210, (2004)
  • [6] LI Ding, XIA Lu, Application of a hybrid particle swarm optimization to airfoil design, Aeronautical Computing Technique, 40, 6, pp. 66-71, (2010)
  • [7] SHI Jiying, GONG Ying, XUE Fei, Et al., Distribution network reconfiguration with PSO-CS algorithm considering electric vehicles, Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 30, 2, pp. 66-70, (2018)
  • [8] MIRJALILI S, MIRJALILI S M, LEWIS A., Grey wolf optimizer, Advances in Engineering Software, 69, pp. 46-61, (2014)
  • [9] HU Jianxiu, ZENG Jianchao, Selection on intertia weicht of particle swarm optimization, Computer Engineering, 11, pp. 193-195, (2007)
  • [10] COOK P, MCDONALD M, FIRMIN M., Aerofoil RAE-2822: pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements, (1979)