Study on the decision of PPP project return mechanism under the public value perspective: based on PSO-TRP model

被引:0
|
作者
Shi S. [1 ]
Zhao F. [1 ]
Li H. [1 ]
Chen H. [2 ]
Hu X. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo
[2] School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha
[3] Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing
来源
关键词
bottom line thinking; particle swarm optimization; payback mechanism; PPP project; public values; tri-reference point theory;
D O I
10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.T20231160
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The return mechanism is the core attribute of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects, and the government is the key decision-making body of the cooperative production of public services in PPP projects. The decision-making logic of its return mechanism is related to the balance between the public nature of the PPP project and the economic efficiency, which is the key issue that directly affects the success or failure of the PPP project. First, the research hypotheses were proposed by comprehensively considering the public nature of PPP projects, the reference point effect, and the law of diminishing marginal utility. Second, the tri-reference point theory (TRP) was introduced to construct a decision model of the PPP project return mechanism and analyze its constraints. Finally, the particle swarm algorithm was used to conduct case simulation, scenario simulation, and option selection for the decision-making problem of the government, aiming at how to choose the payoff mechanism in order to maximize the utility in the context of budget constraints and bottom line logic. The study found that: 1) the government ’ s perceived value in PPP projects increases and then decreases as the goal rises, showing an inverted U-shaped distribution, with the perceived value and effort level increasing with the bottom line, and the optimal position is that the public value is maximized. 2) When the government ’ s bottom line is certain and the target is high, the government fully or partially cedes public resources to the social capital body, choosing the user-payment or feasibility gap subsidy mode. 3) When the value of the government ’ s psychological weight changes, the greater the weight of success, the subject in the optimal range of objectives increases the degree of their inputs, and chooses risky behavior based on public value; when the greater the weight of failure, the subject of the decision-making process would reduce the degree of their input, and choose to protect the bottom of the behavior based on public value. Based on the public value perspective and the introduction of the tri-reference point theory, the study constructed a decision-making model for the return mechanism of PPP projects based on particle swarm algorithm, which provides a new idea for the research of governmental decision-making in PPP projects, and at the same time provides a reference for the maintenance of the public nature of PPP projects and the realization of public value. © 2024, Central South University Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1634 / 1644
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] YUAN Jingfeng, SHANG Donghao, QIU Zuozhou, Et al., Research on emergence mechanism of social risk for PPP projects under different return mechanism[J], Systems Engineering−Theory & Practice, 40, 2, (2020)
  • [2] LIU Yongquan, CHEN Zhibin, The study on asset ownership and financial and tax treatment of PPP project under the pattern of “joint contribution, co-governance and shared benefits” [J], Accounting Research, 2022, 8
  • [3] SHANG Luming, ABDEL AZIZ A M., Stackelberg game theory-based optimization model for design of payment mechanism in performance-based PPPs, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146, 4, (2020)
  • [4] LIU Ting, WANG Shouqing, FENG Ke, Minimum revenue guarantee mechanism design for toll road PPP projects[J], Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 57, 6, (2017)
  • [5] SHEN Juqin, SHI Wenjun, WANG Zhaoxia, A research on the return mechanism decision of PPP project[J], Price: Theory & Practice, 9, (2018)
  • [6] FAULKNER N, KAUFMAN S., Avoiding theoretical stagnation: a systematic review and framework for measuring public value[J], Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77, 1, (2018)
  • [7] WANG Xuejun, Public service co-production under the public value perspective: review and prospect[J], Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 2, (2020)
  • [8] Qianwei ZHU, Administrative analysis of public value[J], Public Administration and Policy Review, 12, 1, (2023)
  • [9] REYNAERS A M., Public values in public-private partnerships[J], Public Administration Review, 74, 1, (2014)
  • [10] ZHANG Shouwen, The publicity of PPP and its economic law analysis[J], Law Science, 11, (2015)