Comparative analysis of seismic design parameter values for geosynthetic-reinforced soil abutment based on shaking table test

被引：0
|
作者：
Luo M. [1 ,2 ]
Xu C. [2 ]
Liang C. [3 ]
Shen P. [4 ]
Chen Y. [1 ]
机构：
[1] The Architectural Design, Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co, Ltd., Hangzhou
[2] Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
[3] Institute of Science and Technology, China Three Gorges Corporation, Beijing
[4] Shanghai Investigation, Design & Research Institute Co, Ltd., Shanghai
来源：
Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology) | 2024年 / 55卷 / 01期
关键词：
bridge and culvert engineering; geosynthetics; GRS abutments; seismic design; shaking table test;
D O I：
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2024.01.031
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
At present, there are standardized technical guidelines for the design and construction of geosynthetic reinforced soil abutments(GRS abutments) under static loads, but for the seismic design methods of GRS abutments, there are only some principles and frameworks. There is no specific parameter value method, which needs to be further improved. Firstly, the methods for calculating the parameters of seismic design of geosynthetic reinforced earth retaining walls in relevant domestic and foreign codes or standards were listed and compared, and the similarities and differences were analyzed qualitatively. Then, combined with the monitoring data of the shaking table scale model test under the 1g gravity field, the applicability of the existing seismic design parameter selection method of reinforced earth retaining wall to GRS abutment was tested and relevant suggestions were put forward through the comparison between the actual measured value and the standard value. The results show that the critical acceleration value for the large deformation of the GRS abutment is at least 0.6g, which is greater than 0.3g−0.4g of the general reinforced soil retaining wall, and that before reaching the critical acceleration(0.6g), the GRS abutment is basically not damaged, and the lateral deformation increment does not exceed 0.5%. Therefore, it is recommended that the seismic design of the GRS abutment should be controlled so that the lateral deformation increment of the abutment does not exceed 0.5%. Under this premise, the value method of the horizontal seismic coefficient in the foreign NCMA, FHWA and AASHTO codes is basically applicable to the GRS abutment, and can be used for the calculation of the overall external stability of the GRS abutment; as for the local stability at the top of the GRS abutment, it is necessary to learn from the concept of domestic highway regulations, and further study and propose a more reasonable method for the value of acceleration amplification factor. The value method of the NCMA code for the dynamic increment of the axial force of the reinforcement is suitable for the GRS abutment, and it is relatively safe in design. The method of the FHWA and AASHTO codes can only be used after being revised. © 2024 Central South University of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：375 / 387
页数：12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] YAZDANDOUST M., Investigation on the seismic performance of steel-strip reinforced-soil retaining walls using shaking table test[J], Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 97, (2017)
  • [2] MIZUHASHI M, SUGITA H, SASAKI T., Analytical study on geotextile-reinforced soil retaining walls damaged during the 2004 Mid Niigata prefecture Japan earthquake[C], Geo-Shanghai International Conference 2008, (2008)
  • [3] KUWANO J, MIYATA Y, KOSEKI J., Performance of reinforced soil walls during the 2011 Tohoku earthquake[J], Geosynthetics International, 21, 3, (2014)
  • [4] HAYASHI T, NAKAMURA S, KONAMI T., The effects of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake on multi-anchored reinforcement wall, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Geosynthetics, pp. 253-259, (2018)
  • [5] WU J T H, YANG K H, MOHAMED S, Et al., Suppression of soil dilation-a reinforcing mechanism of soil-geosynthetic composites[J], Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 1, 1, (2014)
  • [6] WU J T H, KETCHART K, ADAMS M T., Two full-scale loading experiments of geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment wall, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2, 4, (2013)
  • [7] ADAMS M, NICKS J, STABILE T, Et al., Geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system synthesis report, (2011)
  • [8] NGO T., Feasibility study of geosynthetic reinforced soil intergrated bridge systerms(GRS-IBS) in Oklahoma, (2016)
  • [9] ADAMS M T, NICKS J, STABILE T, Et al., Geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system interim implementation guide, (2012)
  • [10] LUO Minmin, XU Chao, YANG Zifan, Geosynthetic reinforced soil-integrated bridge system and its applications [J], China Civil Engineering Journal, 52, S1, (2019)
1234