Deactivation mechanism of sodium poisoning hydrodesulfurization catalyst

被引:0
|
作者
Sun J. [1 ]
Chen X. [1 ]
Liu M. [1 ]
Liu L. [1 ]
Niu S. [1 ]
Guo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] SINOPEC Dalian Research Institute of Petroleum and Petrochemicals Co., Ltd., Liaoning, Dalian
关键词
catalyst; deactivation; hydrodesulfurization (HDS); sodium poisoning;
D O I
10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1318
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The hydrosulfurization catalyst deactivation by sodium poisoning was studied by element analysis, pore property and acid property characterization and it was confirmed that the significant reduction of acid content was responsible for the poisoning, rather than carbon deposition or impurities blocking the pore. XRD, H2-TPR and hydrodesulfurization activity characterization confirmed that sodium poisoning strengthened the aggregation of MoO3, increased the reduction temperature of active metal, and decreased the hydrodesulfurization activity. The catalyst deactivation mechanism was that the macro-molecular sulfides with substituent aromatic rings could not be removed by direct desulfurization, and must be saturated by hydrogenation of the aromatic rings before desulfurization. The reduction of acid content of sodium poisoning catalyst reduced the hydrogenation capacity, resulting in the deactivation of the catalyst. Meanwhile, SEM-EDS analysis confirmed that Na impurities were evenly distributed along the radial direction of the catalyst, and the catalyst had no obvious adsorption to Na impurities. Therefore, even a small amount of Na impurities could penetrate the entire catalyst bed, leading to a significant reduction in the operating run-time of the industrial unit. © 2024 Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd.. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 413
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] ZHOU Jibin, ZHAO Jianping, ZHANG Jinling, Et al., Regeneration of catalysts deactivated by coke deposition: A review, Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 41, 7, pp. 1048-1061, (2020)
  • [2] SUN Jin, GUO Rong, YANG Chengmin, Et al., Effects of carbon and silicon deposition on activity of hydrogenation catalyst and regeneration performance, Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 48, 5, pp. 43-47, (2017)
  • [3] ELIZALDE Ignacio, ANCHEYTA Jorge, Modeling the deactivation by metal deposition of heavy oil hydrotreating catalyst, Catalysis Today, 220, pp. 221-227, (2014)
  • [4] KOHLI K, PRAJAPATI R, MAITY S K, Et al., Deactivation of a hydrotreating catalyst during hydroprocessing of synthetic crude by metal bearing compounds, Fuel, 243, pp. 579-589, (2019)
  • [5] ZUO Yanmei, Industrial application of ultrasonic-electric desalination technology, Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 49, 2, pp. 100-103, (2018)
  • [6] WANG Zhenyu, ZHANG Feng, SHEN Minghuan, Et al., Study of sodium removal of high-sodium crude oil, Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 51, 7, pp. 1-5, (2020)
  • [7] LI Dadong, Hydrogenation process and engineering, pp. 511-512, (2004)
  • [8] CHEN Yufei, XIN Jing, HAN Longnian, Et al., Analysis of physical properties and regeneration performance of liquid-phase hydrogenation deactivated catalyst, Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 52, 9, pp. 45-48, (2022)
  • [9] ZHANG Yuting, ZHANG Guohui, ZHU Jinjian, Et al., Study on process of removing sodium from hydrogenation refining agent carrier, Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 51, 11, pp. 88-90, (2019)
  • [10] ZHANG Jiexiao, LIU Ziyang, ZHOU Lingping, Et al., Study on sodium removal process and microactivity of catalytic cracking catalyst, Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 46, 2, pp. 43-48, (2015)