Effect of Cabin Tray Table Height on Passengers' Head and Neck Posture and Perceived Level of Discomfort

被引:0
|
作者
Wang L. [1 ]
Yu S.-H. [1 ]
Chen D.-K. [1 ]
Chu J.-J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Industrial Design and Ergonomics Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an
关键词
3D scanning; Comfort; Head/neck posture angle; PLD test; Tray table;
D O I
10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.09.014
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To improve the comfort of the cabin space in aircraft, focusing on the difficulty to directly collect anthropometric data of head/neck posture angle, a method is proposed in this paper to obtain the head/neck posture angle indirectly by 3D scanning. A 3D scanning and a perceived level of discomfort(PLD)test are combined with a questionnaire, the results of which show that most passengers think that the current tray table is too low and uncomfortable. When tested with original height(68 cm)tray table, the subjects' head/neck posture angles are all outside the neutral region, indicating that the head/neck posture is excessive flexion. After tray table is raised gradually(73-78-83 cm)and the same tests are repeated, the subjects' HFA and NFA decreased significantly. The HFA and NFA are closer to or reach the neutral range. In PLD tests, with the rise of the tray table, the data first decreases and then rises. It shows that adjusting the tray table in 73~83 cm can significantly improve the passengers' head/neck posture and reduce the discomfort of passengers' neck. © 2021, Editorial Department of Journal of Northeastern University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1313 / 1322
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Vink P., Aircraft interior comfort and design, pp. 29-40, (2011)
  • [2] Vendel M, Dangal S, Coppens J, Et al., Effects of a hand luggage guiding system on airplane boarding time and passenger experience, International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace, 6, 3, pp. 1-25, (2019)
  • [3] Franz M, Durt A, Zenk R, Et al., Comfort effects of a new car headrest with neck support, Applied Ergonomics, 43, 2, pp. 336-343, (2012)
  • [4] Villanueva M, Jonai H, Sotoyama M, Et al., Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal, Industrial Health, 35, 3, pp. 330-336, (1997)
  • [5] Young J G, Trudeau M, Oedll D, Et al., Touch-screen tablet user configurations and case-supported tilt affect head and neck flexion angles, Work, 41, 1, pp. 81-91, (2012)
  • [6] Zhong Yuan, Research on structural optimization and modeling design of civil aviation seats, (2015)
  • [7] Chen Xiang, Study on comprehensive evaluation model of passenger comfort of high-speed railway passenger cars, (2010)
  • [8] Xie Y, Szeto G, Dai J., Prevalence and risk factors associated with musculoskeletal complaints among users of mobile handheld devices: a systematic review, Applied Ergonomics, 59, pp. 132-142, (2017)
  • [9] Syamala K, Ailneni R, Kin J, Et al., Armrests and back support reduced biomechanical loading in the neck and upper extremities during mobile phone use, Applied Ergonomics, 73, pp. 48-54, (2018)
  • [10] Straker L, Burgess-Limerick R, Pollock C, Et al., The influence of desk and display design on posture and muscle activity variability whilst performing information technology tasks, Applied Ergonomics, 40, 5, pp. 852-859, (2009)