A Generalized approach to the operationalization of Software Quality Models

被引:0
|
作者
Izurieta, Clemente [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reimanis, Derek [3 ]
O’Donoghue, Eric [3 ]
Liyanage, Kaveen [4 ]
Muneza, A. Redempta Manzi [3 ]
Whitaker, Bradley [4 ]
Reinhold, Ann Marie [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, United States
[2] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, United States
[3] Gianforte School of Computing, Montana State University, Bozeman, United States
[4] Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Montana State University, Bozeman,MT, United States
关键词
D O I
10.7717/PEERJ-CS.2357
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Comprehensive measures of quality are a research imperative, yet the development of software quality models is a wicked problem. Definitive solutions do not exist and quality is subjective at its most abstract. Definitional measures of quality are contingent on a domain, and even within a domain, the choice of representative characteristics to decompose quality is subjective. Thus, the operationalization of quality models brings even more challenges. A promising approach to quality modeling is the use of hierarchies to represent characteristics, where lower levels of the hierarchy represent concepts closer to real-world observations. Building upon prior hierarchical modeling approaches, we developed the Platform for Investigative software Quality Understanding and Evaluation (PIQUE). PIQUE surmounts several quality modeling challenges because it allows modelers to instantiate abstract hierarchical models in any domain by leveraging organizational tools tailored to their specific contexts. Here, we introduce PIQUE; exemplify its utility with two practical use cases; address challenges associated with parameterizing a PIQUE model; and describe algorithmic techniques that tackle normalization, aggregation, and interpolation of measurements. © (2024), (PeerJ Inc.). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Generalized approach to the operationalization of Software Quality Models
    Izurieta, Clemente
    Reimanis, Derek
    O'Donoghue, Eric
    Liyanage, Kaveen
    Muneza, A. Redempta Manzi
    Whitaker, Bradley
    Reinhold, Ann Marie
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 10
  • [2] STATISTICAL PREDICTION OF SOFTWARE QUALITY BASED ON GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS
    Inoue, Shinji
    Yamada, Shigeru
    ICIM'2016: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, : 403 - 408
  • [3] Combining software quality predictive models:: An evolutionary approach
    Bouktif, S
    Kégl, B
    Sahraoui, H
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 385 - 392
  • [4] Improving predictive models of software quality using an evolutionary computational approach
    Vivanco, Rodrigo
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE, 2007, : 517 - 518
  • [5] On statistical models for predicting software quality/reliability: generalized linear and linear mixed modeling
    Shinji Inoue
    Naoya Yamashita
    Shigeru Yamada
    Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, 2017, 6 (1) : 15 - 21
  • [6] A Review on Software Quality Models
    Singh, Brijendra
    Kannojia, Suresh Prasad
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES (CSNT 2013), 2013, : 801 - 806
  • [7] Software product quality models
    Ferenc, Rudolf
    Hegedús, Péter
    Gyimóthy, Tibor
    Evolving Software Systems, 2014, : 65 - 100
  • [8] A Study of Software Quality Models
    Davuluru, Tharashasank
    Medida, Jayapal
    Reddy, V. S. K.
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH (ICAETR), 2014,
  • [9] Review of Studies on Service Quality in Public Utilities: A Construct Operationalization Approach
    Kumar, Vivek
    Rai, R. S.
    Koner, Jonarden
    PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 15 (12): : 57 - 65
  • [10] A visual analytics approach for the assessment of information quality of performance models—a software review
    Marco Angelini
    Cinzia Daraio
    Luca Urban
    Scientometrics, 2022, 127 : 6827 - 6853