Research on production-decision of automakers considering consumer’s low-carbon preference under the government reward-penalty mechanism

被引:0
|
作者
Wang H. [1 ]
Yan X. [2 ]
Zhao D. [1 ]
Ge L. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Management Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan
[2] School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dual-credit policy; evolutionary game; new energy vehicles; reward-penalty mechanism;
D O I
10.12011/SETP2023-0003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Under the conditions of government reward-penalty mechanism and consumers’ low-carbon preference, this paper constructs the consumer’s utility function, the automakers’ profit function and evolutionary game model between government and automakers. And the relevant factors of the dual-credit policy, such as credit transaction price and the requirement of credit ratio are included in the model. It also analyzes the evolutionary stable strategy of automakers’ production-decisions under the situation that the government replaces subsidies with rewards and regulate the market with penalties. The results show that: 1) Government adopts dynamic rewards and static penalties as the optimal policy combination. In addition, moderately increasing penalties will help to improve the production enthusiasm of new energy automakers. 2) A higher trading price of credit is more conducive to the rapid development of the new energy vehicle industry in the short term, but it is easy to cause market fluctuations. 3) The improvement of the endurance performance attributes and quality attributes of new energy vehicles will increase the profit advantage of new energy automakers, but the improvement of consumers’ recognition of endurance performance attributes and quality attributes will reduce their profit advantage. © 2023 Systems Engineering Society of China. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2669 / 2684
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Measures for the parallel administration of the average fuel consumption and new energy vehicle points of passenger vehicle enterprises
  • [2] 2021 Domestic automobile consumer rights public opinion research report
  • [3] Bergek A, Berggren C., The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A review of energy and automotive industry studies[J], Ecological Economics, 106, pp. 112-123, (2014)
  • [4] Sierzchula W, Bakker S, Maat K, Et al., The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption[J], Energy Policy, 68, 5, pp. 183-194, (2014)
  • [5] Ma L, Zhong W J, Mei S E., An innovative research on subsidy policies in new energy automotive industry under the background of “supply-front reform”[J], Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 37, 9, pp. 2279-2288, (2017)
  • [6] Ji S F, Zhao D, Luo R J., Evolutionary game analysis on local governments and manufacturers’ behavioral strategies: Impact of phasing out subsidies for new energy vehicles, Energy, 189, (2019)
  • [7] Cao X, Xing Z Y, Zhang L P., An evolutionary game analysis of new energy vehicle development under government regulations[J], Management Review, 30, 9, pp. 82-96, (2018)
  • [8] Sun Q, Chen H, Long R, Et al., Who will pay for the “bicycle cemetery”? Evolutionary game analysis of recycling abandoned shared bicycles under dynamic reward and punishment[J], European Journal of Operational Research, 305, 2, pp. 917-929, (2023)
  • [9] Zhao Y, Wang W, Ni Y., EPR system based on a reward and punishment mechanism: Producer-led product recycling channels[J], Waste Management, 103, pp. 198-207, (2020)
  • [10] Ma Y, Shi T, Zhang W, Et al., Comprehensive policy evaluation of NEV development in China, Japan, the United States, and Germany based on the AHP-EW model[J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, pp. 389-402, (2019)