Effects of Controlled-release Blended Fertilizer on Crop Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Wheat-maize Rotation System

被引:0
|
作者
Gao W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang X.-X. [1 ,3 ]
Xie J.-Z. [2 ]
Chen Y.-H. [1 ,3 ]
Ni X.-H. [1 ,3 ]
Wang J.-C. [1 ,3 ]
Dong Y.-F. [4 ]
Li Z.-S. [4 ]
Cao B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Plant Nutrition,Resource and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing
[2] College of Resources & Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding
[3] Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center for Slow,Controlled-Release Fertilizer, Beijing
[4] Dezhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dezhou
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2024年 / 45卷 / 05期
关键词
controlled-release blended fertilizer; global warming potential; greenhouse gas emissions; nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency; wheat-maize rotation system; yield;
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.202305191
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing use of nitrogen fertilizers exerts extreme pressure on the environment(e. g.,greenhouse gas emissions,GHGs)for winter wheat-summer maize rotation systems in the North China Plain. The application of controlled-release fertilizers is considered as an effective measure to improve crop yield and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency. To explore the impact of one-time fertilization of controlled-release blended fertilizer on crop yield and GHGs of a wheat-maize rotation system,field experiments were carried out in Dezhou Modern Agricultural Science and Technology Park from 2020 to 2022. Five treatments were established for both winter wheat and summer maize,including no nitrogen control(CK),farmers’ conventional nitrogen application(FFP),optimized nitrogen application(OPT),CRU1(the blending ratio of coated urea and traditional urea on winter wheat and summer maize was 5∶5 and 3∶7,respectively),and CRU2(the blending ratio of coated urea and traditional urea on winter wheat and summer maize was 7∶3 and 5∶5,respectively). The differences in yield,nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency,fertilization economic benefits,and GHGs among different treatments were compared and analyzed. The results showed that nitrogen application significantly increased the single season and annual crop yields of the wheat-maize rotation system(P < 0. 05). Compared with those of FFP,the CRU1 and CRU2 treatments increased the yields of summer maize by 0. 4% to 5. 6%,winter wheat by -5. 4% to 4. 1%,and annual yields by -1. 1% to 3. 9%(P > 0. 05). N recovery efficiency(NRE),N agronomic efficiency(NAE),and N partial factor productivity(NPFP)were increased by -8. 6%-43. 4%,2. 05-6. 24 kg·kg-1,and 4. 24-10. 13 kg·kg-1,respectively. Annual net income increased by 0. 2% to 6. 3%. Nitrogen application significantly increased the annual emissions of soil N2O and CO2 in the rotation system(P < 0. 05)but had no effect on the annual emissions of CH4(except for in the FFP treatment in the first year). The annual total N2O emissions under the CRU1 and CRU2 treatments were significantly reduced by 23. 4% to 30. 2% compared to those under the FFP treatment(P < 0. 05). Additionally,nitrogen application significantly increased the annual global warming potential(GWP)of the rotation system(P < 0. 05),but the intensity of greenhouse gas emissions was reduced due to the increase in crop yields. Compared with that under FFP,the annual GWP under the CRU1 and CRU2 treatments decreased by 9. 6% to 11. 5%(P < 0. 05),and the annual GHGs decreased by 11. 2% to 13. 8%(P > 0. 05). In summary,the one-time application of controlled-release blended fertilizer had a positive role in improving crop yield and economic benefits,reducing nitrogen fertilizer input and labor costs,and GHGs,which is an effective nitrogen fertilizer management measure to promote cleaner production of food crops in the North China Plain. © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2891 / 2904
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] He L Y,, Zhang A F,, Wang X D,, Et al., Effects of different tillage practices on the carbon footprint of wheat and maize production in the Loess Plateau of China[J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, pp. 297-305, (2019)
  • [2] Wang Y Y,, Li X X,, Dong W X,, Et al., Review on greenhouse gas emission and reduction in wheat-maize double cropping system in the North China Plain[J], Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 26, 2, pp. 167-174, (2018)
  • [3] Walling E,, Vaneeckhaute C., Greenhouse gas emissions from inorganic and organic fertilizer production and use:a review of emission factors and their variability[J], Journal of Environmental Management, (2020)
  • [4] Xue J F,Pu C,, Liu S L,, Et al., Carbon and nitrogen footprint of double rice production in Southern China [J], Ecological Indicators, 64, pp. 249-257, (2016)
  • [5] Qu W K, Xu X X, Hao T J,, Et al., Effects of nitrogen application rate on annual yield and N-use efficiency of winter wheat-summer maize rotation under drip irrigation[J], Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 28, 7, pp. 1271-1282, (2022)
  • [6] Wang H T,, Kobke S,, Dittert K., Use of urease and nitrification inhibitors to reduce gaseous nitrogen emissions from fertilizers containing ammonium nitrate and urea[J], Global Ecology and Conservation, (2020)
  • [7] Pei Y,, Chen X W,, Niu Z H,, Et al., Effects of nitrogen fertilizer substitution by cow manure on yield,net GHG emissions,carbon and nitrogen footprints in sweet maize farmland in the Pearl River Delta in China[J], Journal of Cleaner Production, (2023)
  • [8] Ma Q, Qian Y S,Yu Q Q,, Et al., Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer application mitigated N losses and modified microbial community while improving wheat yield and N use efficiency[J], Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, (2023)
  • [9] Shcherbak I,, Millar N,, Robertson G P., Global metaanalysis of the nonlinear response of soil nitrous oxide(N<sub>2</sub>O)emissions to fertilizer nitrogen[J], Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 25, pp. 9199-9204, (2014)
  • [10] Xia L L,, Lam S K,, Chen D L,, Et al., Can knowledge-based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta-analysis[J], Global Change Biology, 23, 5, pp. 1917-1925, (2017)