Numerical investigation on a precast bridge using GPC and BFRP reinforcements subjected to cross-fault rupture and fling step excitation

被引:1
|
作者
Ngo, Tuan T. [1 ,2 ]
Pham, Thong M. [3 ]
Hao, Hong [1 ,4 ]
Tran, Duong T. [1 ]
Bi, Kaiming [5 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Civil & Mech Engn, Ctr Infrastruct Monitoring & Protect, Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[2] Quy Nhon Univ, Fac Engn & Technol, 170 An Duong Vuong St, Binh Dinh, Vietnam
[3] Univ South Australia, UniSA STEM, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[4] Guangzhou Univ, Earthquake Engn Res & Test Ctr, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Earthquake Engn & Appl Tech, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Precast bridge; Earthquake excitations; BFRP reinforcements; Geopolymer concrete; Cross-fault rupture; Fling step effects; LS-DYNA; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; SEGMENTAL COLUMN; BLENDED SLAG; CONCRETE; GEOPOLYMER; BEHAVIOR; JOINTS; BARS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118992
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigates the seismic performances of a precast bridge made of geopolymer concrete (GPC) with fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcements subjected to cross-fault ground motions. A numerical model was developed and verified against experimental results from a previous study and then used to evaluate the bridge's performances under earthquake excitations. The study found that a simplified model was able to reliably capture the failure pattern and displacement response of the bridge, reducing simulation time significantly. Additionally, the numerical results indicated the combination of torsional and flexural cracks was the primarily damage mode of the columns, which was not observed in the experimental test. This study also revealed that while the performances of the bridge using ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and GPC were similar under low ground excitations, GPC columns were more susceptible to brittle failure under higher ground excitations due to their brittleness. The use of FRP reinforcements led to similar displacement response as steel reinforcements under low ground displacement excitation, although severe flexural and shear damages on the column of Bent 2 were observed due to the lower elastic modulus and shear resistance of Basalt FRP material than steel. To address the disadvantages of brittle GPC and low-modulus of basalt FRP reinforcements, it is suggested to reinforce GPC with fibres and/or increase stirrup ratios if green GPC and corrosion-resistant basalt FRP reinforcements are used to construct bridges for seismic resistance.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据