Quantitative analysis of sustainable cost of prefabricated concrete structures

被引:0
|
作者
Wu K. [1 ]
Wang Z. [2 ]
Jin W. [1 ]
Wang W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Structural Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou
[2] Shanghai Construction No.2(Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai
[3] Hangzhou City Expressway Co., Ltd., Hangzhou
关键词
Direct cost; Energy/resource; Environmental cost; Prefabricated concrete structure; Social cost; Social impact assessment;
D O I
10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.C303
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To explore the implementation effects of prefabricated buildings on the goals of improving efficiency, reducing labor dependence, and reducing pollution emissions, it is necessary to conduct a quantitative analysis on the economic, environmental, and social impacts of prefabricated buildings from the sustainability perspective. Economic evaluation can use direct costs. Environmental impact assessment needs to consider the environmental costs in terms of the production of precast components, equipment fuel consumption, construction dust, and waste emissions. Social impact assessment considers the impact of workplace accidents on workers, noise on the productivity of community and the property value, as well as the impact on government taxation caused by the decline in individual and enterprise incomes. Taking the construction of a prefabricated concrete residential building as an example, the differences in energy, resource consumption, direct cost, environmental cost, and social cost between the prefabricated concrete structure and cast-in-place concrete structure were calculated and compared. Furthermore, the proportion of changes in labor cost, material cost, and equipment cost were analyzed. The impact of regional socioeconomic parameters on the environment and social costs were illustrated. The results show that the total cost of the prefabricated concrete structure is 12%-15% higher than that of the cast-in-place structure, of which the direct cost is about 27% higher, the environmental cost is about 7% higher, and the social cost is more than 90% lower. © 2021, Editorial Office of Journal of Building Structures. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 144
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] JIN Weiliang, Life-cycle design on engineering structures, pp. 66-72, (2020)
  • [2] JIN Weiliang, ZHONG Xiaoping, Sustainable development-oriented design theory of engineering structures in whole life-cycle, Engineering Science, 14, 3, pp. 100-107, (2012)
  • [3] WANG Zhujun, JIN Weiliang, DONG You, Et al., Hierarchical life-cycle design of reinforced concrete structures incorporating durability, economic efficiency and green objectives, Engineering Structures, 157, pp. 119-131, (2018)
  • [4] world summit outcome, resolution a/60/1 [R/OL], (2005)
  • [5] DONG You, FRANGOPOL D M, SAYDAM D., Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42, pp. 1451-1467, (2013)
  • [6] WANG Guangming, LIU Meixia, Empirical analysis and research of comprehensive benefits of prefabricated concrete buildings, Building Structure, 47, 10, pp. 32-38, (2017)
  • [7] AYE L, NGO T, CRAWFORD R H, Et al., Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules, Energy and Buildings, 47, pp. 159-168, (2012)
  • [8] OMAR W M S W, DOH J H, PANUWATWANICH K, Et al., Assessment of the embodied carbon in precast concrete wall panels using a hybrid life cycle assessment approach in Malaysia, Sustainable Cities and Society, 10, pp. 101-111, (2014)
  • [9] VANCLAY F., International principles for social impact assessment, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21, 1, pp. 5-12, (2003)
  • [10] GILCHRIST A, ALLOUCHE E N., Quantification of social costs associated with construction projects: state-of-the-art review, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 20, 1, pp. 89-104, (2005)