Carrier landing command decision-making algorithm based on trajectory prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang W. [1 ]
Zhang Q. [2 ]
机构
[1] College of Automation, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin
[2] Science and Technology on Underwater Vehicle Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin
关键词
Attribute correlation; Carrier landing; Command decision-making; Decision-making accuracy; Optimal linear neural network ensemble; Prediction accuracy; Trajectory prediction;
D O I
10.11990/jheu.201711018
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To improve the accuracy of the carrier landing command decision-making, we propose a related algorithm based on trajectory prediction algorithm (TPCLCD), which takes the predicted landing trajectory as the basis of command decision-making. TPCLCD includes the trajectory prediction model and the command decision-making model, which are derived based on radial basis function (RBF) network and attribute-related Bayesian algorithm, respectively. Aiming at the stage characteristics of carrier landing trajectory, we establish the trajectory prediction model based on RBF network ensemble to improve the accuracy of the model. Compared with the conventional algorithm, the simulation results show that the carrier landing trajectory prediction model based on the RBF network ensemble has higher prediction accuracy. The decision result of TPCLCD is basically consistent with the landing signal commander. Hence, the proposed model can effectively improve the success rate of carrier landing. © 2019, Editorial Department of Journal of HEU. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] NATOPS landing signal officer manual, (2007)
  • [2] Mazza C.J., Johns F.R., Preliminary Study of Optimal Wave-Off Control: A Parametric Approach, (1973)
  • [3] Zhu Q., Li H., Xia G., Et al., Dynamic multi-attribute decision making of carrier-based aircraft landing risk, Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 34, 5, pp. 615-622, (2013)
  • [4] Marzouk M., Abubakr A., Decision support for tower crane selection with building information models and genetic algorithms, Automation in Construction, 61, pp. 1-15, (2016)
  • [5] Carminati M., Caron R., Maggi F., BankSealer: a decision support system for online banking fraud analysis and investigation, Computers & Security, 53, pp. 175-186, (2015)
  • [6] Gyo Z.X., Ngai E.W.T., Yang C., Et al., An RFID-based intelligent decision support system architecture for production monitoring and scheduling in a distributed manufacturing environment, International Journal of Production Economics, 159, pp. 16-28, (2015)
  • [7] Heidi W., Thumfart S., Lughofer E., Et al., Machine learning based analysis of gender differences in visual inspection decision making, Information Sciences, 224, pp. 62-76, (2013)
  • [8] Goel S., Singh J., Ojha N., Intelligent Aircraft landing decision support system using artificial bee Colony, 20163rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), pp. 2412-2416, (2016)
  • [9] Jia L., Tong Z., Wang C., Aircraft combat survivability calculation based on combination weighting and multiattribute intelligent grey target decision model, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, (2016)
  • [10] Lu K., Li Q., Cheng N., An autonomous carrier landing system design and simulation for unmanned aerial vehicle, Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 1352-1356, (2015)