Can government R&D subsidy stimulate enterprise R&D input? -Dual-perspective heterogeneity analysis based on enterprise size and ownership

被引：0
|
作者：
Li S. [1 ,2 ]
Zhu P. [1 ]
Liao H. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Research Center of Econometrics, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai
[2] Institute of Economics, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai
来源：
Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice | 2022年 / 42卷 / 06期
关键词：
Dynamic panel; Enterprise R&D input; Government R&D subsidies; Subsidy rate;
D O I：
10.12011/SETP2021-3015
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
By constructing the theoretical model of the effect of government R&D subsidy on enterprise R&D input, using the dynamic panel method and the data of Chinese 31 provincial regions during 2009- 2015, this article studies if government R&D subsidy can stimulate enterprise R&D input according to the size and the ownership of enterprises. It is found that government R&D subsidy has significantly stimulated medium-sized enterprise, non-state-owned enterprise and foreign-capital enterprise input and inhibited large-sized enterprise and state-owned enterprise input. By analyzing the effect of high, medium and low subsidy rates, it is found that state-owned enterprises have serious over-subsidy problems, while non-state-owned enterprises have relatively insufficient R&D subsidy, and some foreign-funded enterprises also have over-subsidy problems. © 2022, Editorial Board of Journal of Systems Engineering Society of China. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1591 / 1600
页数：9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Kleer R., Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors, Research Policy, 39, 10, pp. 1361-1374, (2010)
  • [2] Lerner J., The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program, The Journal of Private Equity, 3, 2, pp. 55-78, (2000)
  • [3] Feldman M P, Kelley M R., The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior, Research Policy, 35, 10, pp. 1509-1521, (2006)
  • [4] Soderblom A., Inside the black box of outcome additionality: Effects of early-stage government subsidies on resource accumulation and new venture performance, Research Policy, 44, 8, pp. 1501-1512, (2015)
  • [5] Chen C, Li J Z., Evaluation on efficacy of innovation fund for sci-tech SMEs: Empirical evidence from Zhongguancun science park, Journal of Technology Economics, 10, pp. 8-16, (2013)
  • [6] Li Z, Su J., Additionality and signal effect: Two cutting-edging research questions in the study of R&D programs, Science of Science and Management of S.&T, 7, pp. 3-14, (2017)
  • [7] An T L, Qian H X., Chinese R&D subsidy strategy: Threshold, optimal scale and mode choice, Economic Research Journal, 56, 1, pp. 122-137, (2021)
  • [8] Li W F, Du J, Zhang H., Do R&D subsidies really stimulate firms' R&D self-financing investment: New evidence from China's listed firms, Journal of Financial Research, 10, pp. 130-145, (2017)
  • [9] Li S Q, Zhu P F., Regional competition of local government R&D subsidies, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 39, 4, pp. 867-880, (2019)
  • [10] Chen Q Y, Lin S T, Zhang X., The effect of China's incentive policies for technological innovation: Incentivizing quantity or quality, China Industrial Economics, 4, pp. 79-96, (2020)
123