Key Technologies and Challenges for Energy Complementarity and Optimization of Integrated Energy System

被引：0
|
作者：
Ai Q. [1 ]
Hao R. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
来源：
Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems | 2018年 / 42卷 / 04期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Coordinated interaction; Integrated optimization; Multi-energy complementarity; Regional integrated energy system;
D O I：
10.7500/AEPS20170927008
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Effective access to energy, energy conversion, control and use is the core of modern civilization. Energy Internet, as a new reform of the energy system, connects distributed energy storage, conversion devices, multiple loads and other energy networks, such as cooling, thermal, power and gas system, to achieve two-way complementary energy and integration optimization. The key technologies are selected from energy complementary in energy Internet as the research object. Firstly, the recent research of energy complementary and integration are summarized. Then, based on hybrid energy model, key technologies and challenges, such as system planning, intelligent control, cooperative control and interaction technology, comprehensive evaluation, information security system communication and energy trading services, are summarized as well. Finally, in order to provide some research ideas for multi energy complementarity and integration optimization, the future energy system in the multi-complementary is prospected. © 2018 Automation of Electric Power Systems Press.
引用
收藏
页码：2 / 10and46
页数：1044
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Wang W., Wang D., Jia H., Et al., Review of steady-state analysis of typical regional integrated energy system under the background of energy internet, Proceedings of the CSEE, 36, 12, pp. 3292-3305, (2016)
  • [2] Song H., Liu C., Lawarree J., Nash equilibrium bidding strategies in a bilateral electricity market, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17, 1, pp. 73-79, (2002)
  • [3] Femando O., Franciseo G., Haubrich H.J., Modeling long-term dynamics of electricity markets, Energy Policy, 34, 12, pp. 1411-1433, (2006)
  • [4] Arifovie J., Karaivanov A., Learning by doing vs. learning from others in a principal-agent model, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 34, 10, pp. 1967-1992, (2010)
  • [5] Geidl M., Koeppel G., Favre-Perrod P., Et al., Energy hubs for the future, IEEE Power Energy Magazine, 5, 1, pp. 24-30, (2007)
  • [6] Geidl M., Andersson G., A modeling and optimization approach for multiple energy carrier power flow, IEEE Russia Power Tech, pp. 1-7, (2005)
  • [7] Liu X., Wu J., Jenkins N., Et al., Combined analysis of electricity and heat networks, Applied Energy, 162, pp. 1238-1250, (2016)
  • [8] Xu X., Jia H., Chiang H.D., Et al., Dynamic modeling and interaction of hybrid natural gas and electricity supply system in microgrid, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30, 3, pp. 1212-1221, (2015)
  • [9] Zhang X., Shahidehpour M., Alabdulwahab A., Et al., Optimal expansion planning of energy hub with multiple energy infrastructures, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6, 5, pp. 2302-2311, (2017)
  • [10] Martini L., Tends of smart grids development as fostered by European research coordination: the contribution by the EERA JP on smart grids and the ELECTRA IRP, Proceedings of International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives, (2015)
12345