Numerical simulation of hypersonic double cone flows with high-order methods

被引:0
|
作者
Wang D. [1 ]
Deng X. [1 ]
Wang G. [1 ,2 ]
Liu H. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
[2] School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
[3] China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang
来源
Deng, Xiaogang (xgdeng2000@vip.sina.com) | 1600年 / National University of Defense Technology卷 / 38期
关键词
High-order methods; Hypersonic flow; Shock wave/boundary layer interaction; Verification and validation;
D O I
10.11887/j.cn.201604009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hypersonic low enthalpy laminar flows of double cone with 25°/55° geometry were simulated by using high-order WCNS (weighted compact nonlinear schemes), and their capabilities to accurately predict laminar shock wave/boundary layer interaction were examined. The simulations were performed through adopting the second order MUSCL, the third-order and the fifth-order WCNS as spatial discretization schemes, employing the second-order dual time-stepping approach for time integration and using different flux functions, such as hybrid Roe-Rusnov, AUSMPW+ and Van Leer, for comparison. The effects of high-order methods on time and grid convergence, as well as the dissipation characteristics of flux functions, were analyzed. The numerical simulation results indicate that the high-order methods can obtain well-resolved results on coarse grid and eliminate the sensitivity of flux functions. However, the high-order methods need longer computational time to reach convergence. The computed results show good agreement with the experimental data, and the computational accuracy may be characterized as reasonable for most engineering purposes. © 2016, NUDT Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Babinsky H., Harver J.K., Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions, (2011)
  • [2] Kinight D., RTO WG10: test cases for CFD validation of hypersonic flight, Proceedings of 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, (2006)
  • [3] Gaitonde D.V., Progress in shock wave/boundary interactions, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 72, pp. 80-99, (2015)
  • [4] Harvey J.K., Holden M.S., Wadhams T.P., Code validation study of laminar shock/boundary layer and shock/shock interactions in hypersonic flow. Part a: experimental measurements, Proceedings of 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, (2001)
  • [5] Holden M.S., Wadhams T.P., MacLean M.G., Et al., Measurements of real gas effects on regions of laminar shock wave/boundary layer interaction in hypersonic flows for blind code validation studies, Proceedings of 21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, (2013)
  • [6] MacLean M.G., Holden M.S., Dufrene A., Measurements of real gas effects on regions of laminar shock wave/boundary layer interaction in hypervelocity flows, AIAA Aviation 2014, (2014)
  • [7] Candler G.V., Nompelis I., Holden M.S., Computational analysis of hypersonic laminar viscous-inviscid interactions, Proceedings of 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, (2000)
  • [8] Harvey J.K., Holden M.S., Wadhams T.P., Code validation study of laminar shock/boundary layer and shock/shock interaction in hypersonic flow. Part b: comparison with Navier-Stokes and DSMC solutions, Proceedings of 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, (2001)
  • [9] Nompelis I., Computational study of hypersonic double-cone experiments for code validation, (2004)
  • [10] Nompelis I., Candler G.V., MacLean M., Et al., Numerical investigation of double-cone flow experiments with high-enthalpy effects, Proceedings of 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, (2010)