Numerical Investigation for Effects of Strut Angle on RBCC Inlet

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang Z.-Z. [1 ]
Liu P.-J. [1 ]
Qin F. [1 ]
Shi L. [1 ]
He G.-Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] National Key Laboratory of Combustion, Flow and Thermo-Structure, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an
来源
| 2018年 / Journal of Propulsion Technology卷 / 39期
关键词
Inlet; Numerical simulation; Rocket-based combined cycle; Strut angle;
D O I
10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2018.04.006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to investigate the effects of strut angle on the rocket-based combined cycle engine (RBCC) inlet and optimize its design method, the numerical simulation was employed. The influence of various strut angles on the minimum length of internal compression section had been detailed. The numerical simulation presented herein demonstrated the influence of various strut angles on inlet flow field and performance quantitatively and qualitatively in typical conditions. The results show that the increase of the strut angle results in the decrease of the inlet length (the isolator length of Strut_2, Strut_3, Strut_4 and Strut_5 decreases by 47%, 62%, 70%, 75% when compared with Strut_1) and viscous drag force coefficient (the internal compression section viscous drag force coefficient of Strut_2, Strut_3, Strut_4 and Strut_5 decreases by 33%, 45%, 55%, 59% at [Ma∞]=1.5 and decreases by 37%, 50%, 57%, 61% at [Ma∞]=5.5 when compared with Strut_1). But no influence have been imposed on captured mass flow coefficient or flow uniformity. The inlet was optimized according to the preceded analysis in this paper, the starting performance and other performance parameters are improved effectively. The inlet internal drag coefficient decreases by 13.5% while the inlet external drag coefficient decreases by 5.7%. The total pressure recovery coefficient increases by 2.6% while the cycle static temperature ratio increases by 0.5%. © 2018, Editorial Department of Journal of Propulsion Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 775
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Qin F., Lv X., Liu P.-J., Et al., Research Status and Perspective of the Rocket Based Combined Cycle Propulsion System, Journal of Propulsion Technology, 31, 6, pp. 661-665, (2010)
  • [2] Huang S.-H., He H.-Q., He G.-Q., Et al., Conceptual Design Model of Rocket Base Combined Cycle Propulsion System, Journal of Propulsion Technology, 24, 1, pp. 1-5, (2003)
  • [3] Bulman M., Siebenhaar A., The Strutjet Engine: Exploding the Myths Surrounding High Speed Airbreathing Propulsion, AIAA 95-2475
  • [4] Scott D.H., Experimental Investigation of Generic Three-Dimensional Sidewall-Compression Scramjet Inlets at Mach 6 in Tetrafluoromethane, USA: NASA Langley Technical Report Server, (1998)
  • [5] Kanda T., Wakamatsu Y., Sakuranaka N., Et al., Mach 8 Testing of a Scramjet Engine with Ramp Compression, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 18, 2, pp. 417-423, (2002)
  • [6] Kouichiro T., Kanda T., Kenji K., Aerodynamic Performance of Scramjet Inlet Models with a Single Strut, AIAA 93-0741
  • [7] Singh D.J., Carl A.T., Julie A.H., Three Dimensional Simulation of a Translating Strut Inlet, AIAA 92-0270
  • [8] Zhang K.-Y., Xiao X.-D., Xu H., Parametric Analysis and Experimental Investigation on Side Wall Compression Inlet, Journal of Propulsion Technology, 16, 6, pp. 20-25, (1995)
  • [9] Herrmann C., Koschel W., Experimental Investigation of the Internal Compression Inside a Hypersonic Intake, AIAA 2002-4130
  • [10] Reinartz B.U., Herrmann C.D., Ballmann J., Et al., Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of a Hypersonic Inlet Isolator Using Computation and Experiment, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 19, 5, pp. 868-875, (2003)