Optimum Condition Selection Method and Test Verification for Objective Evaluation of Powertrain Drivability

被引：0

作者：

Zhou W. ^{[1
,2
]}

Guo X. ^{[1
,2
]}

Pei X. ^{[1
,2
]}

Zhang C. ^{[1
,2
]}

Yan J. ^{[3
]}

Xia J. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Wuhan University of Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology of Automotive Parts, Wuhan

[2] Wuhan University of Technology, Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Components Technology, Wuhan

[3] Transmission System Design Section Powertrain Development Department, The Technology Centre of Dongfeng Motor Corporation, Wuhan

来源：

Qiche Gongcheng/Automotive Engineering | 2021年 / 43卷 / 03期

关键词：

Drivability evaluation; Improved AHP-CV-TOPSIS model; Optimum condition selection; Test verification;

D O I：

10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2021.03.008

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In view of the poor rationality in selecting the working conditions for powertrain drivability evaluation, an optimum condition selection method is proposed for powertrain drivability evaluation based on combined weight and improved TOPSIS method. Firstly, the objective evaluation indicators of drivability are analyzed according to the working principle of powertrain with the software and hardware for testing and analysis developed. Then, based on the idea of combined weighting and adopting analytic hierarchy process(AHP)and coefficient of variation (CV)methods, the subjective and objective weights are determined, and the principle of minimum relative information entropy is applied to obtaining the optimum weights of AHP-CV model. Furthermore, the improved TOPSIS method with weighted Mahalanobis distance instead of Euclidean distance is used to build the optimum selection model for vehicle drivability evaluation conditions. Finally, the static gear shifting conditions are studied as an example, and the values of weighted indicators of 10 sub-conditions are obtained, with the sub-conditions comprehensively sorted. The test results show that the proposed improved AHP-CV-TOPSIS model has good suitability in condition selection for vehicle drivability evaluation, and can reveal the degree of importance of each sub-condition for drivability evaluation, providing scientific guidance in condition selection for subjective and objective evaluations of vehicle drivability. © 2021, Society of Automotive Engineers of China. All right reserved.

引用

页码：358 / 363

页数：5

共 17 条

[1] WALTERS T L, SHAW P, MADURAI KUMAR M, Et al., Analysis lead drivability assessment
[2] GUAN X, ZONG C F, WANG H J., Current situation and prospect of research on subjective evaluation of vehicle chassis dynamics performance, Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering, 1, 4, pp. 159-174, (2011)
[3] SHI X M, CHEN Z F., Subjective evaluation of automobile dynamics, (2011)
[4] LIST H O, SCHOEGGL P., Objective evaluation of vehicle driveability
[5] SCHOEGGL P, RAMSCHAK E., Vehicle driveability assessment using neural networks for development, calibration and quality tests
[6] DOREY R E, MARTIN E J., Vehicle driveability-the development of an objective methodology
[7] CHANDRASEKARAN K, RAO N, PALRAJ S, Et al., Objective drivability evaluation on compact SUV and comparison with subjective drivability
[8] SHIN C W, CHOI J, CHA S W, Et al., An objective method of driveability evaluation using a simulation model for hybrid electric vehicles, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15, 2, pp. 219-226, (2014)
[9] LEI Y L, LIU K, FU R, Et al., Shift quality evalation model based on ideal shift process, Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 45, 2, pp. 358-363, (2015)
[10] ZHANG T, LIU P H., Objective evaluation system of vehicle fuel economy, performance and drivability, Journal of Tongji University(Nature Science), 43, 12, pp. 1865-1872, (2015)

← 1 2 →