Coupling model identification of giant magnetostrictive actuator using invasive weed algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Yang L. [1 ]
Wu H. [1 ]
Liu S. [2 ]
Li H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Power Control Department, Navy Submarine Academy, Qingdao
[2] College of Power Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan
来源
| 2018年 / National University of Defense Technology卷 / 40期
关键词
Giant magnetostrictive actuator; Hysteresis nonlinearity; Improved invasive weed optimization; Model identification;
D O I
10.11887/j.cn.201805014
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The hysteresis model of giant magnetostrictive actuator, considering the hysteresis loss and dynamic stress, can comprehensively reveal the electric, magnetic, mechanical and thermal multi-field coupling effect. It is often, however, difficult to accurately identify the nonlinear model by the experiment. The intelligent IWO (invasive weed optimization) with a fierce competition mechanism and strong search ability is very suitable for solving the problem of multi-objective physical parameters identification. Nevertheless, the number of seeds is linearly generated in traditional IWO and the distribution variance is lack of adaptability as well, which greatly affects the algorithm convergence speed and model recognition accuracy. Therefore, an improved algorithm with nonlinear propagation and distribution was proposed and applied to the model parameters identification of giant magnetostrictive actuator. The experiment exhibits that the improved algorithm has stronger noise suppression ability, which can accurately identify the physical parameters of the hysteresis nonlinear model with noise signal, and the errors between model predictions and experimental data are much smaller, thus the identified parameters can make the hysteresis nonlinear model comprehensively describe the actuator multi-field coupling mechanism and dynamic characteristics. © 2018, NUDT Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 96
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Valadkhan S., Morris K., Khajepour A., Review and comparison of hysteresis models for magnetostrictive materials, Journal of Intelligent Material System and Structures, 20, 2, pp. 131-142, (2009)
  • [2] Hiller M.W., Bryant M.D., Umegak I.J., Attenuation and transformation of vibration through active control of magnetostrictive terfenol, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 134, 3, pp. 507-519, (1989)
  • [3] Cui X., He Z., Li D., Et al., Research review of modeling for giant magnetostrictive actuator, Ordnace Material Science and Engineering, 34, 4, pp. 90-94, (2011)
  • [4] Tan X.B., Baras J.S., Modeling and control of hysteresis in magnetostrictive actuators, Automatica, 40, 9, pp. 1469-1480, (2004)
  • [5] Smith R.C., Dapino M.J., Seelecke S., Free energy model for hysteresis in magnetostrictive transducers, Journal of Applied Physics, 93, 1, pp. 458-466, (2003)
  • [6] Jiles D.C., Thoelke J.B., Devine M.K., Numerical determination of hysteresis parameters for the modeling of magnetic properties using the theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 28, 1, pp. 27-35, (1992)
  • [7] Jia Z., Wang X., Wang F., Identification method of giant magnetostrictive transducer's dynamic parameters and magnetic parameters, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 43, 10, pp. 9-13, (2007)
  • [8] Calkins F.T., Smith R.C., Flatau A.B., Energy based hysteresis model for magnetostrictive transducers, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 36, 2, pp. 429-439, (2000)
  • [9] Almeida I.A., Deepcu S., Limaam N., Et al., Modeling a magnetostrictive transducer using genetic algorithm, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 226-230, pp. 1262-1264, (2001)
  • [10] Xu P., Yang B., Meng G., Et al., Modeling and parameter identification for giant magnetostrictive actuators applied in driving segmented mirrors, Astronomical Research & Technology, 7, 2, pp. 150-157, (2010)