Internal multiple suppression method based on iterative inversion

被引:0
|
作者
Bao P. [1 ]
Wang X. [2 ]
Xie J. [2 ]
Wang W. [3 ]
Shi Y. [4 ,5 ]
Xu J. [1 ]
Yang Y. [6 ]
机构
[1] School of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing
[2] Northwest Branch of Exploration and Development Research Institute of CNPC, Lanzhou
[3] Bohai Rim Energy Research Institute, Northeast Petroleum University, Qinhuangdao
[4] Institute of Unconvent Oil and Gas, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing
[5] Key Laboratory of Continental Shale Hydrocarbon Accumulation and Efficient Development, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing
[6] Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla
来源
Acta Geophysica Sinica | 2021年 / 64卷 / 06期
关键词
Common Focus Point (CFP); Convolution factor; Data driven; Internal multiple;
D O I
10.6038/cjg2021O0285.
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The suppression of internal multiples is a difficult problem in seismic data processing, especially for the processing of field data. In general, there is no obvious difference in time, frequency and stacking velocity between internal multiples and primaries, which is a great challenge in the identification, prediction and suppression of internal multiples. In this paper, we propose a convolution factor based on the theory of Common Focus Point (CFP) internal multiples suppression, which makes the suppression of internal multiples become an iterative inversion process to suppress internal multiples. Multiple Suppression Inversion (MSI) avoids the focusing operation which requires to construct the CFP gathers, so that the computational efficiency of multiples prediction is greatly improved, without the need for any prior information in the subsurface, which is fully data-driven. Tests on model data proves that the method proposed in this paper is effective and feasible. © 2021, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2061 / 2072
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Araujo F V, Weglein A B, Carvalho P M, Et al., Inverse scattering series for multiple attenuation: an example with surface and internal multiples, 64th Ann. Internat Mtg., Soc. Expi. Geophys, pp. 1039-1041, (1994)
  • [2] Behura J, Wapenaar K, Snieder R., Autofocus imaging: image reconstruction based on inverse scattering theory, Geophysics, 79, 3, pp. A19-A26, (2014)
  • [3] Berkhout A J., Seismic processing in the inverse data space, Geophysics, 71, 4, pp. A29-A33, (2006)
  • [4] Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J., Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion, Part I, Theoretical considerations, Geophysics, 62, 5, pp. 1586-1595, (1997)
  • [5] Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J., Removal of internal multiples with the common-focus-point (CFP) approach: Part 1-Explanation of the theory, Geophysics, 70, 3, pp. V45-V60, (2005)
  • [6] Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J., Focal transformation, an imaging concept for signal restoration and noise removal, Geophysics, 71, 6, pp. A55-A59, (2006)
  • [7] Foster D J, Mosher C C., Suppression of multiple reflections using the Radon transform, Geophysics, 57, 3, pp. 386-395, (1992)
  • [8] Hampson D., Inverse velocity stacking for multiple elimination, 56th Ann. Internat Mtg., Soc. Expi. Geophys, (1986)
  • [9] Ikelle L T., A construct of internal multiples from surface data only: the concept of virtual seismic events, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 164, 2, pp. 383-393, (2006)
  • [10] Ikelle L T, Erez I, Yang X J., Scattering diagrams in seismic imaging: More insights into the construction of virtual events and internal multiples, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 67, 2, pp. 150-170, (2009)