Robust semi-supervised modelling method and its application to fault detection in chemical processes

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou L. [1 ]
Song Z. [2 ]
Hou B. [1 ]
Fei Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, 310024, Zhejiang
[2] College of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, Zhejiang
来源
Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal | 2017年 / 68卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fault detection; Principal component analysis; Process control; Process systems; Robust model; Semi-supervised learning;
D O I
10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161205
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In most complex chemical processes, measurements are often collected with noises and some outliers. These contaminated data would have negative effect on the accuracy of data-based process modelling and fault detection. A new robust semi-supervised PLVR model (RSSPLVR) was proposed by consideration of the real measuring environment in chemical processes and extended to a nonlinear model K-RSSPLVR with a kernel methodology. In both RSSPLVR and K-RSSPLVR, a weighted coefficient based on sample similarity among all observations was used as prior checking parameter of probability model to effectively eliminate influence of outliers on modelling. Model parameter training was accomplished by analysis of the weighted dataset with EM algorithm and a fault detection scheme was developed. Finally, TE process simulation demonstrated effectiveness of the proposed modelling methods. © All Right Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1115
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Qin S.J., Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis, Annual Reviews in Control, 36, 2, pp. 220-234, (2012)
  • [2] Liu Q., Chai T.Y., Qin S.J., Et al., Progress of data-driven and knowledge-driven process monitoring and fault diagnosis for industry process, Control and Decision, 25, 6, pp. 801-807, (2010)
  • [3] Ge Z., Song Z., Gao F.R., Review of recent research on data-based process monitoring, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52, 10, pp. 3543-3562, (2013)
  • [4] Yin S., Ding S.X., Xie X., Et al., A review on basic data-driven approaches for industrial process monitoring, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61, 11, pp. 6418-6428, (2014)
  • [5] Li W., Yue H.H., Valle-Cervantes S., Et al., Recursive PCA for adaptive process monitoring, Journal of Process Control, 10, 5, pp. 471-486, (2000)
  • [6] Yin S., Ding S.X., Haghani A., Et al., A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process, Journal of Process Control, 22, 9, pp. 1567-1581, (2012)
  • [7] Woodall W.H., Montgomery D.C., Some current directions in the theory and application of statistical process monitoring, Journal of Quality Technology, 46, 1, (2014)
  • [8] Qin S.J., Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond, Journal of Chemometrics, 17, 8-9, pp. 480-502, (2003)
  • [9] Macgregor J.F., Jaeckle C., Kiparissides C., Et al., Process monitoring and diagnosis by multiblock PLS methods, AIChE Journal, 40, 5, pp. 826-838, (1994)
  • [10] Chen J., Liu K.C., On-line batch process monitoring using dynamic PCA and dynamic PLS models, Chemical Engineering Science, 57, 1, pp. 63-75, (2002)