Porosity and durability tests on 3D printing concrete: A review

被引:3
|
作者
Ler, Kee-Hong [1 ]
Ma, Chau-Khun [2 ]
Chin, Chee-Loong [1 ]
Ibrahim, Izni Syahrizal [2 ]
Padil, Khairul Hazman [2 ]
Ghafar, Mohd Aminul Izmeer Ab [1 ]
Lenya, Alva Ami [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Civil Engn, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Inst Smart Infrastruct & Innovat Construct, Fac Civil Engn, Forens Engn Ctr, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
关键词
3D printing concrete; Porosity; Durability tests; Shrinkage; Chemical attack; STRENGTH; CHLORIDE; PERFORMANCE; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137973
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
3D concrete printing represents a modern trend in construction automation, characterized by the layer-by-layer deposition of concrete using 3D printers to construct structures without traditional formwork. This process alters the rheological behavior, microstructure, mechanical properties, and durability of 3D-printed concrete compared to conventional cast concrete. This review outlines the porosity and durability tests conducted in previous research papers. It presents the details and procedures of these tests, along with any referenced standards or guidelines. By comparing printed specimens to cast specimens, both similar and controversial results from the tests are also comprehensively discussed. It becomes evident that the durability properties of printed specimens differ from those of cast specimens due to their distinct pore systems. Ultimately, this review aims to bridge research gaps in 3DPC durability performance and assist in the selection of methodologies for porosity and durability tests.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D concrete printing: review
    Nehme, Salem
    Abeidi, Ayman
    EPITOANYAG-JOURNAL OF SILICATE BASED AND COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2022, 74 (05): : 183 - 187
  • [2] Durability of 3D Printed Concrete: A Comparison of Extrusion 3D Printing, Shotcrete 3D Printing and Conventional Casting
    Boehler, David
    Mai, Inka
    Lowke, Dirk
    FOURTH RILEM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCRETE AND DIGITAL FABRICATION, DC 2024, 2024, 53 : 283 - 290
  • [3] Mix suitable for concrete 3D printing: A review
    Khan, M. A.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 32 : 831 - 837
  • [4] Biomimicry for 3D concrete printing: A review and perspective
    du Plessis, Anton
    Babafemi, Adewumi John
    Paul, Suvash Chandra
    Panda, Biranchi
    Tran, Jonathan Phuong
    Broeckhoven, Chris
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2021, 38
  • [5] Biomimicry for 3D concrete printing: A review and perspective
    du Plessis, Anton
    Babafemi, Adewumi John
    Paul, Suvash Chandra
    Panda, Biranchi
    Tran, Jonathan Phuong
    Broeckhoven, Chris
    Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 38
  • [6] 3D Concrete Printing: A Systematic Review of Rheology, Mix Designs, Mechanical, Microstructural, and Durability Characteristics
    Rehman, Atta Ur
    Kim, Jung-Hoon
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (14)
  • [7] Differences between 3D printed concrete and 3D printing reinforced concrete technologies: a review
    Momeni, Komeil
    Vatin, Nikolai Ivanovich
    Hematibahar, Mohammad
    Gebre, Tesfaldet Hadgembes
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 10
  • [8] 3D Vision in 3D Concrete Printing
    Sokolov, Dmitrii
    Mechtcherine, Viktor
    FOURTH RILEM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCRETE AND DIGITAL FABRICATION, DC 2024, 2024, 53 : 182 - 189
  • [9] Rheometry for Concrete 3D Printing: A Review and an Experimental Comparison
    Jayathilakage, Roshan
    Rajeev, Pathmanathan
    Sanjayan, Jay
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (08)
  • [10] 3D printing sandstone porosity models
    Ishutov, Sergey
    Hasiuk, Franciszek J.
    Harding, Chris
    Gray, Joseph N.
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2015, 3 (03): : SX49 - SX61