A Weighted-Overlap Based Metric for Single Visual Object Tracking Evaluation

被引：0
|
作者：
Sun Q. [1 ]
Zhang S.-X. [1 ]
Zhang Z.-X. [1 ]
Cao L.-J. [1 ]
Li X.-F. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Control and Engineering, Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi'an, 710025, Shaanxi
来源：
Sun, Qiao (seq1211@126.com) | 1600年 / Chinese Institute of Electronics卷 / 45期
关键词：
Annotation; Evaluation metric; Overlap; Visual tracking; Zooming;
D O I：
10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2017.03.036
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Aimed at the problems of annotation of ground truth and the application of zooming, a new basic metric for visual tracking evaluation is proposed. Firstly, a weighted-overlap frame is reconstructed based on the traditional overlap.Secondly, we put forward multiple region annotation to decrease the deviation and apply in zooming. Thirdly, a multi-label fusion method is presented to improve the confidence level of the labels. Last but not least, the presented methods are expanded to repeated visual tracking evaluation, where a weighted result chart is utilized to make the evaluation more explanatory.Experimental results show that our annotation rule are more accurate than VOT and OTB, and the proposed metric is more appropriate than other metric. © 2017, Chinese Institute of Electronics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：753 / 761
页数：8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Li K., He F.-Z., Pan Y.-T., Et al., Multi-classifier object tracking based on cluster similarity, Acta Electronica Sinica, 44, 4, pp. 821-825, (2016)
  • [2] Song T., Li O., Liu G.-Y., Quasi-sequential Monte Carlo visual tracking based on multilevel dynamic layer representations in confidence region, Acta Electronica Sinica, 44, 6, pp. 1355-1361, (2016)
  • [3] Pang Y., Ling H., Finding the best from the second bests-inhibiting subjective bias in evaluation of visual tracking algorithms, Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2784-2791, (2013)
  • [4] Smeulde A.W.M., Chu D.M., Cucchiara R., Et al., Visual tracking: an experimental survey, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36, 7, pp. 1442-1468, (2014)
  • [5] Wu Y., Lim J., Yang M., Object tracking benchmark, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 37, 9, pp. 1834-1848, (2015)
  • [6] Nawaz T., Cavallaro A., A protocol for evaluating video trackers under real-world conditions, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 22, 4, pp. 1354-1361, (2013)
  • [7] Kristan M., Pflugfelder R., Leonardis A., Et al., The visual object tracking VOT2013 challenge results, Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, pp. 98-111, (2013)
  • [8] Kristan M., Matas J., Leonardis A., Et al., A novel performance evaluation methodology for single-target trackers, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38, 11, pp. 2137-2155, (2016)
  • [9] Teng H., Yu L., Liu H., Et al., A novel performance evaluation method for visual tracking methods, Proceedings of the 2015 Chinese Intelligent Automation Conference, pp. 313-324, (2015)
  • [10] Cehovin L., Leonardis A., Kristan M., Visual object tracking performance measures revisited, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25, 3, pp. 1261-1274, (2015)
12