Evaluation of uniform seismic collapse risk of RC frames using different target spectra

被引：0
|
作者：
Lu D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qiao Z. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Key Lab of Structural Dynamic Behaviors and Control, Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
[2] Key Lab of Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disasters, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
[3] Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Ministry of Emergency Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
来源：
Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal | 2022年 / 55卷
关键词：
absolute collapse risk; code design spectrum; RC frame structure; relative collapse risk; uniform hazard spectrum; uniform risk seismic design; uniform risk spectrum;
D O I：
10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2022.s1.0314
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
It is necessary to make shift from the current traditional paradigm of uniform hazard to the more rational paradigm of uniform risk for seismic fortification parameters determination and seismic design method of engineering structures. To achieve the goal of uniform risk prevention and control, it needs dual-control of both absolute and relative collapse risks of structures under earthquakes, and also needs to take target spectrum to select ground motion records to compute and check the two kinds of structural collapse risks. In this paper, the reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures are taken as case studies, and three target spectra, including code design spectrum, uniform hazard spectrum and uniform risk spectrum, are utilized to select the ground motion records. The incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) technique is used to derive the collapse fragility curves and functions. The analytical seismic hazard function using seismic fortification parameters and the probabilistic seismic hazard function based on seismic safety evaluation results of building site are respectively chosen to compute and verify the seismic collapse risks of the case-study structures. It is shown by the analysis results that, using code design spectrum to evaluate the seismic collapse risk of structures will get the conservative evaluation results, while using the site-specific spectra can more rationally realize the goal of uniform risk seismic design, since it can consider the variability in seismic hazards in different building sites due to different seismic tectonic environments. © 2022 Editorial Office of China Civil Engineering Journal. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：75 / 82
页数：7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Luco N, Ellingwood B R, Hamburger R, Et al., Risk-targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States [C], SEAOC 2007 Convention Proceedings, (2007)
  • [2] FEMA P750 NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, (2009)
  • [3] ASCE/SEI 7-10 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, (2010)
  • [4] FEMA PI050 NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, (2015)
  • [5] ASCE/SEI 7-16 Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures, (2016)
  • [6] FEMA P2082 NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, (2020)
  • [7] ASCE/SEI 7-22 Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures, (2022)
  • [8] Sengara I W, Masyhur I, Sidi I D, Et al., Development of earthquake risk-targeted ground motions for Indonesian Earthquake Resistance Building Code SNI 1726-2012 [C], Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP12), (2015)
  • [9] Sengara I W, Sidi I D, Mulia A, Et al., Development of risk coefficient for input to new Indonesian seismic building codes [J], Journal of Engineering Technology, 48, 1, pp. 49-65, (2016)
  • [10] Horspool N, Gerstenberger M C, Elwood K J., Risk targeted hazard spectra for seismic design in New Zealand, Proceedings of the 2021 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference, (2021)
1234