Improved bayesian network model for supplier selection of complicated product development

被引:0
|
作者
Zhong J. [1 ,2 ]
Bai Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei
[2] Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-Making, Ministry of Education, Hefei
来源
| 1600年 / Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society卷 / 52期
关键词
Bayesian network; Complicated product development; Supplier selection;
D O I
10.3901/JME.2016.01.175
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Complicated product development (CPD) is a collaborative development process participated in by enterprise and its many suppliers together. Supplier evaluation and selection, and the coordination among suppliers and enterprise are directly related to the success or failure of CPD and the performance of complicated product. A supplier selection indicator system of CPD is established, and then construct a Bayesian network model which is comprised of criteria layer, factors layer, cost items layer and the total cost. Moreover, the nodes belonged to the criteria layer and factors layer be of three states in the model. The group analytic hierarchy process and linear weighting method are adopted to acquire the model parameters in order to decrease the workload and the difficulty of expert and the requirements for expert knowledge and experience during the parameters setting. Total cost for each alternative is computed by the model inference process in which quantitative indicators are transformed into evaluation distribution by introducing the conception of belief degree. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by a computational example of supplier selection for a car air conditioning which is on the base of the whole car development of a motor company. Furthermore, we make sensitivity analysis of the proposed Bayesian network model by means of the model parameters reflecting enterprise preference. © 2016 Journal of Mechanical Engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 183
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Krajewski L.J., Ritzman L.P., Operations Management Strategy and Analysis, (1996)
  • [2] Weber C.A., Current J.R., Benton W.C., Vendor selection criteria and methods, European Journal of Operation Research, 50, 1, pp. 2-18, (1991)
  • [3] Yang S., Theories and Methodologies on Engineering Management of Complicated Product Development, (2012)
  • [4] Primo M., Amundson S., An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes, Journal of Operations Management, 20, 1, pp. 33-52, (2002)
  • [5] Spina G., Verganti R., Zotteri G.A., Model of co-design relationships: Definitions and contingencies, International Journal of Technology Management, 23, 4, pp. 304-321, (2002)
  • [6] Humphreys P., Huang G., Cadden T., Et al., Integrating design metrics within the early supplier selection process, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 13, 1, pp. 42-52, (2007)
  • [7] Schiele H., How to distinguish innovative suppliers? Identifying innovative suppliers as new task for purchasing, Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 8, pp. 925-935, (2006)
  • [8] Zolghadria M., Eckert C., Zouggar S., Et al., Power-based supplier selection in product development projects, Computers in Industry, 62, 5, pp. 487-500, (2011)
  • [9] Hou L., Han D., Wen Z., Supplier planning and selection for new product collaborative development, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 43, 5, pp. 50-56, (2007)
  • [10] Shen C.Y., Yu K.T., Enhancing the efficacy of supplier selection decision-making on the initial stage of new product development: A hybrid fuzzy approach considering the strategic and operational factors simultaneously, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8, pp. 11271-11281, (2009)