Three-dimensional UH model for structured soils considering bonding

被引：0
|
作者：
Zhu E.-Y. [1 ,2 ]
Li X.-Q. [2 ]
Zhu J.-M. [3 ]
机构：
[1] School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing
[2] School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing
[3] School of Safety Engineering, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Sanhe
来源：
Zhu, Jian-Ming (jmzhu@263.net) | 2018年 / Chinese Society of Civil Engineering卷 / 40期
关键词：
Bonding; Constitutive model; Moving critical state line; Structured soil; Three-dimension;
D O I：
10.11779/CJGE201812006
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to reflect the influences of bonding in structured soils on the ultimate shear stress ratio and dilatancy law, a dynamic moving critical state line (MCSL), which parallels to the traditional static critical state line (CSL) and moves to the CSL as bonding structure decays, is introduced in p-q stress space. Correspondingly, the yielding surfaces and the dilatancy equation are both modified to match the MCSL. After that, a UH model for structured soils considering bonding is developed from the structured UH model mainly considering soil structure collapse. Adopting the transformed stress method, the proposed model is developed to be applied in three-dimensional stress space. Compared to the structured UH model, the proposed new model adds only 1 model parameter expressing the initial bonding level, which can be estimated by unconfined compression tests. Comparisons between test data and model predictions of 4 structured soils indicate that the proposed model is qualified in reasonably describing the behaviors of the bonding structured soils in isotropic compression, drained/undrained triaxial compression and true triaxial shear. © 2018, Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：2200 / 2207
页数：7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Shen Z.-J., Mathematical model for soil structure--The core topic of soil umechanics in the 21 <sup>st</sup> century , Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 18, 1, pp. 95-97, (1996)
  • [2] Shen Z.-J., A masonry model for structured clays, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 21, 1, pp. 1-4, (2000)
  • [3] Xie D.-Y., Qi J.-L., Zhang Z.-Z., A constitutive laws considering soil structural properties, China Civil Engineering Journal, 33, 4, pp. 35-41, (2000)
  • [4] Yin Z.-Y., Elastic viscoplastic model for natural soft clay: review and development, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 33, 9, pp. 1357-1369, (2011)
  • [5] Wang L.-Z., Shen K.-L., A constitutive model of consolidated structured soft clays, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 29, 4, pp. 496-504, (2007)
  • [6] Liu M.D., Carter J.P., A structured cam clay model, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39, 6, pp. 1313-1332, (2002)
  • [7] Asaoka A., Nakano M., Noda T., Superloading yield surface concept for highly structured soil behavior, Soils and Foundations, 40, 2, pp. 99-110, (2000)
  • [8] Nakai T., Shahin H.M., Kikumoto M., Et al., A simple and unified one-dimensional model to describe various characteristics of soils, Soils and Foundations, 51, 6, pp. 1129-1148, (2011)
  • [9] Rouainia M., Wood D.M., A kinematic hardening constitutive model for natural clays with loss of structure, Géotechnique, 50, 2, pp. 153-164, (2000)
  • [10] Yao Y.P., Hou W., Zhou A.N., UH model: Three-dimensional unified hardening model for overconsolidated clays, Géotechnique, 59, 5, pp. 451-469, (2009)
123