Modeling of pedestrian gap acceptance for improving safety at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Sun, D.
[2] Ukkusuri, S.V.S.K.
[3] Benekohal, R.F.
[4] Waller, S.T.
来源
| 2005年 / Aracne Editrice卷
关键词
Regression analysis - Video cameras - Decision making - Probability distributions - Accidents - Crosswalks;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pedestrian accidents at uncontrolled mid-block crossings pose a serious risk in the U.S. and other countries. A clear understanding of the parameters causing these accidents is needed to make the crosswalks safer. The purpose of this paper is to develop realistic models for pedestrian gap acceptance behavior at uncontrolled two-lane mid-block crosswalks. Different methodologies for modeling Pedestrian Gap Acceptance (PGA) are proposed. Three different methodologies are employed for studying PGA, the first model is deterministic and solely depends on the gap sizes that are accepted or rejected by pedestrians. The second model is probabilistic and the probability of accepting a gap is calculated as a random variable from a distribution that best fits the data. The third model uses a binary logit approach; multi-attribute regression analyses are performed to capture the decision making process of the pedestrian. Field studies were conducted to collect the data of different attributes using a set of video cameras at several typical unsignalized mid-block crosswalks during two pedestrian flow peak hours of five working days. The data was used to calibrate and validate the different proposed models. The results show that PGA binary logit models perform better than the other models. Moreover, additional insights are provided into the PGA behavior based on the data.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative analysis of pedestrian safety at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in China
    Zhang, Cunbao
    Zhou, Bin
    Chen, Guojun
    Chen, Feng
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2017, 108 : 19 - 26
  • [2] Evaluation of pedestrian safety margin at mid-block crosswalks in India
    Avinash, Chaudhari
    Jiten, Shah
    Arkatkar, Shriniwas
    Gaurang, Joshi
    Manoranjan, Parida
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 119 : 188 - 198
  • [3] Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing
    Yannis, G.
    Papadimitriou, E.
    Theofilatos, A.
    TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 36 (05) : 450 - 462
  • [4] Pedestrian crossing behaviors at uncontrolled multi -lane mid-block crosswalks in developing world
    Zhang, Cunbao
    Zhou, Bin
    Qiu, Tony Z.
    Liu, Shaobo
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2018, 64 : 145 - 154
  • [5] Models for pedestrian gap acceptance behaviour analysis at unprotected mid-block crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions
    Kadali, B. Raghuram
    Vedagiri, P.
    Rathi, Nivedan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 32 : 114 - 126
  • [6] The implications of situation and route familiarity for driver-pedestrian interaction at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks
    Angioi, F.
    Bassani, M.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 90 : 287 - 299
  • [7] Interaction between vehicles and pedestrians at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks
    Chen, Peng
    Wu, Chaozhong
    Zhu, Shunying
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2016, 82 : 68 - 76
  • [8] Modeling and Simulation of Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Uncontrolled Mid-block Crosswalk
    Chen P.
    Tang P.
    Yan W.-X.
    Sun Q.-Y.
    Jiaotong Yunshu Xitong Gongcheng Yu Xinxi/Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22 (04): : 79 - 88and95
  • [9] Gap Acceptance of Crossing Pedestrians at Unprotected Mid-Block Crosswalks in Urban Divided Highways
    Wickramasinghe, V
    Diddeniya, D. G. V. C.
    Lakmali, K. G. M.
    ENGINEER-JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS SRI LANKA, 2022, 55 (01): : 63 - 68
  • [10] Gap acceptance probability model for pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks based on logistic regression
    Zhao, Jing
    Malenje, Jairus Odawa
    Tang, Yu
    Han, Yin
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2019, 129 : 76 - 83