Simplified methods for deformation analysis of tunnel structures considering spatial variability of soil properties

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang J.-Z. [1 ,2 ]
Huang H.-W. [1 ]
Zhang D.-M. [1 ]
Phoon K.-K. [2 ]
Tang C. [2 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
[2] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Random field; Scale of fluctuation; Simplified method; Spatial variability; Tunnel;
D O I
10.11779/CJGE202201013
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The spatial variability of soil properties is widely accepted, and the response of a geo-structure can be significantly affected by the spatial variability of the surrounding soil mass. The random field theory is a popularly used method to simulate the spatial variability of soil properties. The stochastic analysis of horizontal convergence of tunnel is carried out using the random field difference method considering the spatial variability of Young's modulus. The random field difference method is combined with the Monte Carlo method and finite difference simulation based on random field theory. A large number of Monte Carlo simulations are adopted in the proposed random field difference method. Meanwhile, three simple and easy-to-use methods for the spatial variability of soil are proposed: reduction factor method, amplification factor method and reliability partial factor calibration method. Based on the statistical analysis of the calculated results, the suggested values of three simplified analysis methods under different combinations of the horizontal scale of fluctuation, the vertical scale of fluctuation and the coefficient of variation are given. This study may provide references for the application of spatial variability research to practical geotechnical engineering. © 2022, Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 143
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] HUANG H W, SHAO H, ZHANG D M, Et al., Deformational responses of operated shield tunnel to extreme surcharge: a case study, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13, 3, pp. 345-360, (2017)
  • [2] HUANG H W, XIAO L, ZHANG D M, Et al., Influence of spatial variability of soil Young's modulus on tunnel convergence in soft soils, Engineering Geology, 228, pp. 357-370, (2017)
  • [3] PHOON K K, KULHAWY F H., Characterization of geotechnical variability, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36, 4, pp. 612-624, (1999)
  • [4] ZHANG J Z, HUANG H W, ZHANG D M, Et al., Quantitative evaluation of geological uncertainty and its influence on tunnel structural performance using improved coupled Markov chain, Acta Geotechnica, 16, pp. 3709-3724, (2021)
  • [5] TAO Yuan-qin, SUN Hong-lei, CAI Yuan-qiang, Bayesian back analysis considering constraints, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 43, 1, pp. 1878-1886, (2021)
  • [6] ZHANG W G, HAN L, GU X, Et al., Tunneling and deep excavations in spatially variable soil and rock masses: a short review, Underground Space, (2020)
  • [7] VANMARCKE E H., Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 103, 11, pp. 1227-1246, (1977)
  • [8] LI D Q, JIANG S H, CAO Z J, Et al., A multiple response-surface method for slope reliability analysis considering spatial variability of soil properties, Engineering Geology, 187, pp. 60-72, (2015)
  • [9] JIANG Shui-hua, LIU Xian, HUANG Fa-ming, Et al., Failure mechanism and reliability analysis of soil slopes under rainfall infiltration considering spatial variability of multiple soil parameters, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 42, 5, pp. 900-907, (2020)
  • [10] CHING J, HU Y G, PHOON K K., Effective Young's modulus of a spatially variable soil mass under a footing, Structural Safety, 73, pp. 99-113, (2018)