Optimal Scheme Selection of Deep Foundation Pit Engineering Based on Group Evaluation

被引：0

作者：

Cheng H. ^{[1
]}

Ji R. ^{[1
]}

Yang J. ^{[1
]}

Cheng H. ^{[1
]}

She J. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan

[2] Gansu Civil Engineering Research Institute, Lanzhou

[3] Langold Real Estate, Wuhan

来源：

Ji, Rui (714697384@qq.com) | 2018年 / Science Press卷 / 46期

关键词：

Deep foundation pit engineering; Evaluation rules; Group evaluation; Interval numbers of three elements; Scheme optimization;

D O I：

10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2018.02.020

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The optimal scheme selection of deep foundation pit engineering is mainly exercised by the group negotiation among owner, designer, constructor, supervisor and social partners. Due to the lack of principles in deep foundation pit engineering scheme' evaluation, this paper tries to construct evaluation rules in three aspects: weight distribution and redistribution for individuals, effectiveness judgment of heterogeneous body and group information integration. In the meantime, the paper tries to process fuzzy information with interval numbers of three elements. We ranked schemes of the deep foundation pit engineering according to the group value obtained from the research above. A case study is presented to verify the feasibility and validity of the evaluation rules. It provides a more reasonable research method and theoretical foundation for scheme optimization of deep foundation pit engineering based on the group decision. © 2018, Editorial Department of Journal of Tongji University. All right reserved.

引用

页码：273 / 280

页数：7

共 14 条

[1] Xu Y., Study on the optimum decision-making and evaluation model for the design of deep excavation, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 27, 7, (2005)
[2] Ouyang X., Luo B., Guan J., Et al., Study on Risk Assessment of Deep Foundation Excavation, Construction Technology, (2009)
[3] Hou F., Guo Y., Yu Z., Evaluation relation transformation and its application in group evaluation, Journal of Systems & Management, 21, 3, (2012)
[4] Chen J., Su W., Some issues about group evaluation technology, Statistical Research, 25, 8, (2008)
[5] Li D., Value Theory, (1987)
[6] Sun X., Zeng S., A method based on authority and consistency for determining experts' weights in group comprehensive evaluation, Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 44, 8, (2014)
[7] Perez I.J., Cabrerizo F.J., Alonso S., Et al., A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2, (2013)
[8] Wan M., The selection of science and technology appraisal expert and judgment method for their appraisal behavior, Research & Development Management, 19, 3, (2007)
[9] Keeney R.L., Kikrwood C.W., Group decision-making using cardinal social welfare functions, Management Science, 22, 4, (1975)
[10] Song G., Zou P., The method of determining the weight of the decision-maker in multiattribute group decision-making, Systems Engineering, 19, 4, (2001)

← 1 2 →