Modeling test on explosion cavity to study anchored surface rock around cavern

被引：0
|
作者：
Xu G. [1 ]
Yuan W. [1 ,2 ]
Gu J. [3 ]
Zhang X. [3 ]
Xie X. [1 ]
机构：
[1] The Air Force Engineering Design and Research Institute, Beijing
[2] Geotechnical Research Institute, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing
[3] The Third Engineer Scientific Research Institute of Logistic Support Department, CMC, Luoyang, 471023, Henan
来源：
Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering | 2017年 / 36卷 / 10期
关键词：
Anchor cable; Explosive resistivity; Model test; Reinforcement; Rock characteristics; Rock mechanics;
D O I：
10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.1646
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The homogeneous, layered and block surrounding rocks anchored by crossing cables were studied in two groups of modeling tests to improve the explosive resistivity of country rocks. The macroscopic failure mode, the swelled shape, the distribution of cracks and the size of the explosion cavity of both reinforced and unreinforced surrounding rocks were studied. The research results showed that the crossing cables increased the tension strength and shear strength of rock, the explosive resistivity of country rocks was improved notably. The degree of model destruction was significantly influenced by rock characteristics. For the anchored rocks, the swelled height of the block models are bigger than the ones of homogeneous and layered models. The rock characteristics are the main factors affecting the crack distribution of the models. The size of explosion cavity of the homogeneous model anchored by the crossing cable is the smallest, of the block model is medium, and of the layered rock is the biggest. © 2017, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：2441 / 2448
页数：7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Yang Z., Study on the anti-detonating characteristics of underground opening reinforced by rock bolts, (2008)
  • [2] Tannant D.D., Brummer R.K., Rock bolt behavior under dynamic loading field tests and modeling, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 32, 6, pp. 537-550, (1995)
  • [3] Anders A., Laboratory testing of a new type of energy absorbing rock bolt, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 20, 4, pp. 291-300, (2005)
  • [4] Fang C., Zhuo J., Experimental study actuality of rock bolts reinforcement mechanism, Journal of Hohai University: Natural Science, 33, 6, pp. 696-700, (2005)
  • [5] Zhang L., Study on stress character of prestessed anchorage in different regional antiknock chamber effected, (2009)
  • [6] Yang Z., Gu J., Chen A., Et al., Model experiment study on influences of reinforcement on intervals of rock bolts in surrounding rock under explosive waves, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 27, 4, pp. 757-764, (2008)
  • [7] Ortlepp W.D., Stacey T.R., Performance of tunnel support under large deformation static and dynamic loading, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 13, 1, pp. 15-21, (1998)
  • [8] Chen J., Sun J., Lin J., Et al., Failure of rock openings under intensive explosion stress wave, Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology, 8, 6, pp. 582-588, (2007)
  • [9] Wang G., Gu J., Chen A., Et al., Model test research on failure forms and failure mechanism of anchor bolts under top explosion, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 31, 1, pp. 27-31, (2012)
  • [10] Yang S., Liang B., Gu J., Et al., Research on characteristics of prestress change of anchorage cable in anti-explosion model test of anchored cavern, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 25, pp. 3749-3756, (2006)
12