Market pricing strategy for gas-electricity integrated energy system considering multiple market entities

被引:0
|
作者
Wang J. [1 ]
Xu J. [1 ]
Ke D. [1 ]
Sun Y. [1 ]
Wang J. [1 ]
Wu Y. [1 ]
Wei C. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Wuhan University, Wuhan
[2] Central China Branch of State Grid Corporation of China, Wuhan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
integrated energy system; locational marginal price; market clearing; market entity; pressure support; voltage support;
D O I
10.16081/j.epae.202205050
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the access of multiple market entities,how to manage distributed resources in the system becomes a key problem of gas-electricity integrated energy system. From the perspective of incentive price,a day-ahead market clearing model for integrated energy system with two types of market entities including commercial building and distributed generators is established. The influence of net active power load,net reactive power load and natural gas load on system operation is considered comprehensively,and multiple sensitivity factors are introduced to linearize power flow and steady-state gas flow constraints. Further,the cleared distribution locational marginal price is divided into seven categories,i.e.,baseline active power price,baseline reactive power price,congestion management price,voltage support price,network loss price,baseline gas price and node pressure support price. Each market entity is encouraged to adjust its own operation mode to support system operation through the guidance of different price signals. Simulative results based on the integrated energy system composed by modified IEEE 33-bus distribution network and 24-node gas network verify the effectiveness and rationality of the proposed pricing strategy based on locational marginal price decomposition. © 2022 Electric Power Automation Equipment Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 26
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] SUN Y,, Et al., Coordinated operation of gas-electricity integrated distribution system with multi-CCHP and distributed renewable energy sources[J], Applied Energy, 211, pp. 237-248, (2018)
  • [2] QIAN Jiaqi, JIANG Yuewen, Multi-type distributed generator planning considering locational marginal capacity cost of distribution network[J], Electric Power Automation Equipment, 36, 3, pp. 94-99, (2016)
  • [3] CHEN Xingying, YU Qingyun, XIE Jun, Et al., DLMP calculation based on power loss and emission reduction allocation using Aumann-Shapley method[J], Electric Power Automation Equipment, 39, 4, pp. 17-23, (2019)
  • [4] Distribution locational marginal pricing for optimal electric vehicle charging through chance constrained mixed-integer programming[J], IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9, 2, pp. 644-654, (2018)
  • [5] DLMP using three-phase current injection OPF with renewables and demand response[J], IET Renewable Power Generation, 13, 7, pp. 1160-1167, (2019)
  • [6] Distribution locational marginal price-based transactive day-ahead market with variable renewable generation[J], Applied Energy, 259, (2020)
  • [7] LESIEUTRE B C., A locational marginal price for frequency balancing operations in regulation markets[J], Applied Energy, 308, (2022)
  • [8] Robust purchase and sale transactions optimization strategy for electricity retailers with energy storage system considering two-stage demand response[J], Applied Energy, 271, (2020)
  • [9] CUI Yang, XIU Zhijian, LIU Chuang, Et al., Dual level optimal dispatch of power system considering demand response and pricing strategy on deep peak regulation[J], Proceedings of the CSEE, 41, 13, pp. 4403-4414, (2021)
  • [10] XU Q., Retail dynamic pricing strategy design considering the fluctuations in day-ahead market using integrated demand response[J], International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 130, (2021)