Interface crack growth based on wavelet cohesive zone model

被引：0
|
作者：
Peng H. [1 ]
Xia Y. [1 ]
Zhou L. [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing
[2] School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun
来源：
Peng, Huifen (phfdaqing@163.com) | 1830年 / Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (BUAA)卷 / 33期
关键词：
Cohesive zone model; Interface crack growth; Strain energy release rate; Virtual crack closure technique; Wavelet finite element;
D O I：
10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20160315.012
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Cohesive zone model (CZM) was applied to numerical analysis of wavelet finite element method (WFEM) by using the excellent localization properties of interval B-spline wavelet, interface elements of wavelet cohesive zone were constructed by regarding interval B-spline wavelet scaling functions as the interpolation functions, stiffness matrix of interface elements of wavelet cohesive zone was derived, and strain energy release rate (SERR) of interface crack was calculated by using virtual crack closure technique (VCCT), and the quasi-static analysis of interface crack growth was achieved by taking β-Κ fracture criterion. The numerical analyzed results of SERR by WFEM and conventional finite element method (CFEM) were compared with theoretical results, and the results show that the SERR calculated by WFEM and CFEM are 96.60 J/m2 and 101.43 J/m2, respectively, and the relative errors of SERR between numerical and theoretical results of two method are 1.85% and 3.06%, respectively. It clearly indicates that WFEM can obtain higher accuracy and efficiency of calculating interface crack growth with less numbers of elements and nodes. On this basis, we studied the influence of initial interface crack length and bi-material elastic modulus ratio on interface crack growth. It is found that the equivalent stress at interface crack tip tends to increase with the increase of initial interface crack length. The difference of bi-material elastic modulus ratio is greater, interface crack is easier to expand, and the length of interface crack growth is also greater, therefore, interface crack growth can be slowed by adjusting bi-material elastic modulus ratio. © 2016, BUAA Culture Media Group Ltd. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1830 / 1837
页数：7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Li C., Tie Y., Zheng Y.P., Influence of material characters on bimaterial interfacial crack energy release rates and stress intensity factors, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 45, 3, pp. 104-108, (2009)
  • [2] Hu D., The numerical simulation on composite materials interface crack propagation mechanism, (2013)
  • [3] Li X.F., Wang B.L., Anti-plane shear crack normal to and terminating at the interface of two bonded piezoelectric ceramics, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 44, 3, pp. 3796-3810, (2007)
  • [4] Miravete A., Jimenez M.A., Application of the finite element method to prediction of onset of delamination growth, Applied Mechanics Reviews, 55, 2, pp. 89-105, (2002)
  • [5] ozdemir I., Brekelmans W.A.M., Geers M.G.D., A thermo-mechanical cohesive zone model, Computational Mechanics, 46, 5, pp. 735-745, (2010)
  • [6] Peng H.F., Meng G.W., Zhou L.M., Et al., Virtual crack closure technique based on wavelet finite element method, Journal of Jilin University: Engineering and Technology Edition, 41, 5, pp. 1364-1368, (2011)
  • [7] Xie D., Biggers S.B., Progressive crack growth analysis using interface element based on the virtual crack closure technique, Finite Elements in Analysis & Design, 42, 11, pp. 977-984, (2006)
  • [8] Lu G.F., Liu Y., Zhang C.L., Analysis of strain energy release rate based on virtual crack closure technique, Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 26, 2, pp. 210-216, (2009)
  • [9] Shen H.J., Yao W.X., Wu Y.T., Synergistic damage evolving model for matrix cracking in composite laminates, Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 32, 4, pp. 1032-1041, (2015)
  • [10] Lu Z.X., A simple review for cohesive zone models of composite interface and their applications, Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics, 36, pp. 85-94, (2015)
12