Effect of HEDTA on the Adsorption of 2,2 Bipyridyl and 3-Mercaptobenzothiazole and Electroless Cu Deposition Rate

被引:1
|
作者
Lindsay, Gavin S. [1 ]
Zarwell, Sebastian [2 ]
Bernhard, Tobias [2 ]
Gregoriades, Laurence [2 ]
Rohde, Dirk [2 ]
Gewirth, Andrew A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Chem, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Atotech Deutschland GmbH & Co, Erasmusstr 20, D-10553 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Electrodepisition; -; Copper; Electrodeposition; electroless; Interface modification; COPPER DEPOSITION; ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID; SILVER; 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE; KINETICS; LIGANDS; SERS; ELECTRODEPOSITION; 2,2'-BIPYRIDINE; ALKANETHIOLS;
D O I
10.1149/1945-7111/ad8268
中图分类号
O646 [电化学、电解、磁化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) and chronoamperometry were utilized to evaluate the electroless deposition of Cu in hydroxyethylethylelenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA)- and tartrate-based baths containing 2,2 '-bipyridyl (BP) and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT). The Cu deposition rate was shown to be faster in tartrate baths, with rates at 0.08 mu m min-1 without MBT or BP but decreased to near zero with concentrations approaching 6 mu M of either MBT or BP. HEDTA baths displayed a slower rate of 0.04 mu m min-1 without MBT or BP. However, the addition of MBT increased the rate up to 4-fold, while BP concentration did not affect the deposition rate. SERS data showed that HEDTA adsorbs to the surface while tartrate does not. Kinetic Langmuir isotherm model fits showed a decrease in MBT and BP adsorption rate in the presence of HEDTA and showed a decrease in HEDTA adsorption upon MBT injection while BP injection did not affect the HEDTA adsorption. Competition between the complexing and the stabilizing agent is a key factor for the rate of electroless Cu deposition.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条